Skip to content

Session Expired

Your session has expired. Please sign in again to continue where you left off.

Sign In Again

MA H94: To ensure accountability and transparency in artificial intelligence systems

In Committee Massachusetts · 2025–2026 session

Last verified Oct 21, 2026 · official bill text

H94 · where it stands

1 of 5 steps complete
  1. Introduced In committee
  2. Passed first chamber
  3. Passed both chambers
  4. Enacted
  5. Effective
What do these statuses mean?
Introduced
Filed in the legislature; may be waiting for a committee hearing.
Passed a chamber
Approved by one or both chambers; awaiting further action.
Enacted
Signed into law, or became law without a signature or over a veto.
Effective date
The date the law says it takes effect. Once it has passed, the page shows "Effective" and the date. A court order can still block a law; if we know of one, the summary says so.
Dead / vetoed
Vetoed, failed, or the session ended without action.

In one paragraph

Massachusetts H94 would add G.L. Chapter 93M requiring developers and deployers of high-risk AI systems used in consequential decisions (education, employment, lending, housing, health care, insurance, legal and government services) to guard against algorithmic discrimination, with Attorney General enforcement. On December 24, 2025 it accompanied H97, which was reported favorably and referred to House Ways and Means.

Plain-English summary, written with AI assistance. The official text controls.

What it means for business

None yet: the bill has not been enacted. If enacted, firms building or using high-risk AI for consequential decisions would need risk programs, assessments and consumer notices.

Key provisions

  1. Developers must use reasonable care against algorithmic discrimination, give deployers documentation, and notify the Attorney General and deployers within 90 days of discovering discrimination.
  2. Deployers of high-risk systems must keep a risk management program (e.g. NIST AI RMF), complete annual impact assessments, and notify consumers with a way to appeal or correct adverse decisions.
  3. Corporations that use AI to target consumers or influence behavior must disclose the purposes and methods, and notify consumers when algorithms set pricing, eligibility or access.
  4. Exempts businesses with fewer than 50 employees that do not train AI on proprietary data, low-risk systems, and entities under equivalent federal rules.
  5. Only the Attorney General enforces (Chapter 93A); no private right of action; no monetary penalty stated.
  6. Sections 1, 4, 5 and 8 take effect 180 days after passage; Sections 2, 3, 6 and 7 one year after passage.

Latest legislative action

Dec 24, 2025. Accompanied H97

Sponsors (showing 5 of 9)

NameRole
Primary
D Primary
D Primary
D Cosponsor
Cosponsor

Topics and industries

This page is general information, not legal advice. Summaries are AI-assisted and may contain errors; read the statute for the controlling text and talk to a lawyer about your situation. Full disclaimer · Report an error