Skip to content

Session Expired

Your session has expired. Please sign in again to continue where you left off.

Sign In Again

MA H1210: Relative to AI health communications and informed patient consent

Dead/Failed Massachusetts · 2025–2026 session

Last verified Oct 8, 2026 · official bill text

H1210 · where it stands

This bill did not become law (dead/failed) · last action Feb 9, 2026.

What do these statuses mean?
Introduced
Filed in the legislature; may be waiting for a committee hearing.
Passed a chamber
Approved by one or both chambers; awaiting further action.
Enacted
Signed into law, or became law without a signature or over a veto.
Effective date
The date the law says it takes effect. Once it has passed, the page shows "Effective" and the date. A court order can still block a law; if we know of one, the summary says so.
Dead / vetoed
Vetoed, failed, or the session ended without action.

In one paragraph

Massachusetts' H 1210 would give patients the right to be told when health information they get was generated by AI, with instructions for reaching a human provider if the provider had not reviewed it. Health insurance carriers would have to disclose AI or automated decision tools used in claims review and file an annual report on AI algorithms and training data used in utilization review, with a bias attestation. Referred to Financial Services February 27, 2025; on February 9, 2026 it accompanied a study order (H 5066) and did not advance as its own bill.

Plain-English summary, written with AI assistance. The official text controls.

What it means for business

None: the bill did not pass. Health care providers would have had to tell patients when information came from AI, and insurers would have had to disclose AI claims-review tools and file yearly algorithm and bias reports.

Key provisions

  1. G.L. c. 111, § 70E: patients would have the right to be informed if information they receive verbally or in writing was generated by AI, and to be given instructions for contacting a human provider if their provider had not reviewed and approved it
  2. G.L. c. 176O, § 6: carrier disclosures would include whether AI algorithms or automated decision tools are or will be used in claims review, with a summary of the tools and how they are used
  3. G.L. c. 176O, § 12: each carrier would submit to the division of insurance by December 31 each year a form detailing the AI algorithms and training data sets used or to be used in utilization review
  4. Carriers would also attest that the algorithms and data sets minimize the risk of bias based on race, color, religious creed, ancestry, age, sex, gender, national origin, handicap or disability, and adhere to evidence-based clinical guidelines
  5. History: referred to the committee on Financial Services February 27, 2025; hearing July 15, 2025; accompanied a study order (H 5066) February 9, 2026

Latest legislative action

Feb 9, 2026. Accompanied a study order, see H5066

Sponsors (showing 5 of 43)

NameRole
Primary
Primary
Primary
Primary
D Cosponsor

Topics and industries

Affected industries

This page is general information, not legal advice. Summaries are AI-assisted and may contain errors; read the statute for the controlling text and talk to a lawyer about your situation. Full disclaimer · Report an error