Skip to content

Session Expired

Your session has expired. Please sign in again to continue where you left off.

Sign In Again

MD HB1385: Health Insurance - Use of Artificial Intelligence - Human Evaluation

Dead/Failed Maryland · 2026 session

Last verified Oct 10, 2026 · official bill text

HB1385 · where it stands

This bill did not become law (dead/failed) · last action Feb 13, 2026.

What do these statuses mean?
Introduced
Filed in the legislature; may be waiting for a committee hearing.
Passed a chamber
Approved by one or both chambers; awaiting further action.
Enacted
Signed into law, or became law without a signature or over a veto.
Effective date
The date the law says it takes effect. Once it has passed, the page shows "Effective" and the date. A court order can still block a law; if we know of one, the summary says so.
Dead / vetoed
Vetoed, failed, or the session ended without action.

In one paragraph

Maryland's HB 1385 (2026, first reader text) would have amended Insurance section 15-10B-05.1 so that audits and compliance reviews of AI, algorithms or software tools used by carriers for utilization review include a human evaluation of the patient's medical records by a licensed health care professional who can question, modify or override the tool's determination, and quarterly performance reviews include a human evaluation of real-world health outcomes. It had a House Health hearing set for March 12, 2026 and died when the 2026 session ended.

Plain-English summary, written with AI assistance. The official text controls.

What it means for business

None: the bill died and did not become law. It would have required carriers using AI in utilization review to add licensed-professional review to audits and quarterly reviews.

Key provisions

  1. Would have amended Insurance section 15-10B-05.1, which covers carriers, pharmacy benefits managers and private review agents that use AI, algorithms or software tools for utilization review
  2. New subsection (E): Commissioner audits or compliance reviews must include a human evaluation of the patient's medical records by a licensed health care professional considering the patient's specific circumstances, who can question, modify or override the tool's determination
  3. New subsection (F): quarterly reviews of the tool's performance, use and outcomes must include a human evaluation of real-world health outcomes, used to improve the tool
  4. Existing duties kept: determinations may not rely solely on a group dataset, may not unfairly discriminate, may not replace the health care provider's role, and the tool may not directly or indirectly cause harm to an enrollee
  5. A tool may not deny, delay or modify health care services
  6. The bill adds no new penalty provisions; it would have taken effect October 1, 2026

Latest legislative action

Feb 13, 2026. Hearing 3/12 at 1:00 p.m.; died when the Maryland General Assembly's 2026 session ended April 13, 2026

Sponsors (showing 5 of 32)

NameRole
Primary
Primary
Primary
Primary
Primary

Topics and industries

Affected industries

This page is general information, not legal advice. Summaries are AI-assisted and may contain errors; read the statute for the controlling text and talk to a lawyer about your situation. Full disclaimer · Report an error