Disclaimer: This page provides general informational summaries only and does not constitute legal advice. AI-generated content may contain errors. Always consult a qualified attorney for guidance specific to your situation.
Read full disclaimer →
AI Summary
The Facial Recognition Technology Warrant Act of 2025's requirements for law enforcement in Minnesota await verification with the full bill text.
Business Impact
If you operate in law enforcement in Minnesota, you must obtain a warrant to use facial recognition technology by 2025 or face legal penalties.
What do these statuses mean? ▼
Introduced
— Filed in the legislature; not yet heard in committee
In Committee
— Assigned to and being reviewed by a legislative committee
Passed
— Approved by one or both chambers; awaiting further action
Signed / Enacted
— Signed into law by the governor; may or may not be in effect yet
Dead / Vetoed
— Vetoed, failed to pass, or session expired without action
Unknown
— Status data not yet available or awaiting classification
Affected Industries
Topics
What This Means
The Facial Recognition Technology Warrant Act of 2025's implications for law enforcement agencies in Minnesota will be clarified upon release of the full bill text.
Key Provisions
- Specific provisions regarding warrant requirements for facial recognition technology use by law enforcement await the full bill text.
Latest Legislative Action
Author stricken Eichorn
Bill Sponsors
| Name | Role |
|---|---|
| Anderson, P. | Primary |
| Dibble | Primary |
| Lucero | Primary |
| Putnam | Primary |
| Relph | Primary |
| Rest | Primary |
| Chamberlain | Cosponsor |
| Clausen | Cosponsor |
| Coleman | Cosponsor |
| Drazkowski | Cosponsor |
| Fateh | Cosponsor |
| Hauschild | Cosponsor |
| Maye Quade | Cosponsor |
| Nelson | Cosponsor |
| Torres Ray | Cosponsor |
| Weber | Cosponsor |
| Wesenberg | Cosponsor |
Compliance Checklist
Obtain a warrant before using facial recognition technology
Who: Law enforcement agencies
Deadline: Before any use of the technology
Penalty: Potential penalties for unauthorized use
Who: Law enforcement agencies
Deadline: Before any use of the technology
Penalty: Potential penalties for unauthorized use
Maintain records of all facial recognition technology usage
Who: Law enforcement agencies
Deadline: Ongoing requirement
Penalty: Potential penalties for failure to maintain records
Who: Law enforcement agencies
Deadline: Ongoing requirement
Penalty: Potential penalties for failure to maintain records
Full Legal Analysis
🔒
Full Analysis for Subscribers
Get the complete legal breakdown, compliance checklist, enforcement timeline, and expert commentary on SF1242.
Unlock Full Analysis →Official Source
Official Bill Text
View SF1242 on official legislature website →
Related Topics
Affected Industries
More Minnesota AI Legislation
SF4100
Minnesota Digital Choice Act
Low
HF3661
Acquisition and use of facial recognition technology by government en…
High
HF3146
Acquisition and use of facial recognition technology by government en…
Medium
HF3980
Online platforms required to provide information pertaining to algori…
High
HF4445
Use of automated decision systems in employment settings regulated.
Low
SF4233
Surveillance-based price and wage discrimination prohibition
Medium
View All MN Laws →
More Minnesota AI Laws
Browse all AI bills and regulations tracked for Minnesota.