Skip to content

Session Expired

Your session has expired. Please sign in again to continue where you left off.

Sign In Again

MN HF3146: Acquisition and use of facial recognition technology by government entities prohibited.

Dead/Failed Minnesota · 2025–2026 session

Last verified Oct 10, 2026 · official bill text

HF3146 · where it stands

This bill did not become law (dead/failed) · last action Mar 5, 2026.

What do these statuses mean?
Introduced
Filed in the legislature; may be waiting for a committee hearing.
Passed a chamber
Approved by one or both chambers; awaiting further action.
Enacted
Signed into law, or became law without a signature or over a veto.
Effective date
The date the law says it takes effect. Once it has passed, the page shows "Effective" and the date. A court order can still block a law; if we know of one, the summary says so.
Dead / vetoed
Vetoed, failed, or the session ended without action.

In one paragraph

Minnesota's HF 3146 would have barred state and local government entities, law enforcement agencies and officials from obtaining, retaining, accessing or using face surveillance systems or their information, or contracting with private entities to do so. Evidence from violations would have been inadmissible, and people could sue for damages of at least $1,000 or $100 per violation, whichever is greater, plus injunctions. Introduced April 7, 2025 and referred to Public Safety Finance and Policy and it never left committee.

Plain-English summary, written with AI assistance. The official text controls.

What it means for business

None: the bill died, so it creates no obligations. It would have barred Minnesota government agencies from using facial recognition.

Key provisions

  1. Would have added Minn. Stat. 626.191; face surveillance means an automated or semiautomated process that helps identify a person from facial characteristics; no companion listed
  2. Government entities and officials could not obtain, use or contract with private entities for face surveillance systems or their information; the text lists no exceptions
  3. Data and evidence from violations inadmissible in court and other proceedings and to be deleted on discovery
  4. A person could seek injunctive or declaratory relief or a writ of mandate; people subjected to face surveillance in violation could recover actual damages, but not less than $1,000 or $100 per violation, whichever is greater, and prevailing plaintiffs would get costs and fees
  5. Officials who violate it could face retraining, suspension or termination, subject to due process; the text sets no criminal penalties
  6. The section would have taken effect August 1, 2025
  7. Introduced April 7, 2025 and referred to Public Safety Finance and Policy; no further action before the Legislature adjourned

Latest legislative action

Mar 5, 2026. Author stricken Engen; no further action before the 2025-2026 Legislature adjourned

Sponsors (showing 5 of 34)

NameRole
Primary
Primary
Primary
Primary
Cosponsor

Related and companion bills

Topics and industries

Affected industries

This page is general information, not legal advice. Summaries are AI-assisted and may contain errors; read the statute for the controlling text and talk to a lawyer about your situation. Full disclaimer · Report an error