In one paragraph
Minnesota's SF 4114 would have put to voters a constitutional amendment adding a sentence to article I, section 3 stating that the constitutional right to freely speak, write and publish does not apply to artificial intelligence, at the 2026 general election. It would not itself have changed the law; the amendment would have needed voter approval. It does not define artificial intelligence. Introduced March 4, 2026 and never left committee.
Plain-English summary, written with AI assistance. The official text controls.
What it means for business
None: the bill died, so it creates no obligations. It would not have regulated businesses directly.
Key provisions
- Would have amended Minnesota Constitution article I, section 3 so that the free-speech right does not extend to artificial intelligence; no companion listed
- Ballot question: 'Shall the Minnesota Constitution be amended to state that artificial intelligence does not have the right to free speech?'
- Submission to voters at the 2026 general election; the text does not define artificial intelligence
- Introduced March 4, 2026 and referred to Judiciary and Public Safety; no further action before the Legislature adjourned
Latest legislative action
Mar 4, 2026. Referred to Judiciary and Public Safety; no further action before the 2025-2026 Legislature adjourned
Sponsors
| Name | Role | District |
|---|---|---|
| Bobby Champion D | Sponsor | SD-059 |
| Eric Lucero R | Sponsor | SD-030 |
| Erin Maye Quade D | Sponsor | SD-056 |
| Warren Limmer R | Sponsor | SD-037 |
Topics and industries
Related topics
Affected industries
This page is general information, not legal advice. Summaries are AI-assisted and may contain errors; read the statute for the controlling text and talk to a lawyer about your situation. Full disclaimer · Report an error