In one paragraph
Bill A4435 updates NJ law to include nonconsensual pornographic deepfake threats and disclosures as criminal offenses.
Plain-English summary, written with AI assistance. The official text controls.
What it means for business
If you use AI for creating images, ensure consent or face legal consequences immediately.
What this means
Introduced in New Jersey, Bill A4435 amends criminal statutes to address nonconsensual pornographic deepfake threats and disclosures, focusing on privacy and coercion.
Key provisions
- Amends P.L.2003, c.206 to include nonconsensual deepfake image creation and disclosure as a crime (Section 1).
- Defines 'deepfake' and criminalizes its nonconsensual disclosure (Section 1b).
- Allows a fine not to exceed $30,000 for violations of subsection c (Section 1c).
- Amends N.J.S.2C:13-5 to include threats to disclose deepfake images as criminal coercion (Section 2).
- Provides an affirmative defense for actions with prior notice and lawful purpose (Section 1d).
Compliance checklist
- Ensure consent for creation and distribution of deepfake content.
- Avoid threats to disclose deepfake images.
Latest legislative action
May 20, 2024. Introduced, Referred to Assembly Judiciary Committee
Full analysis
Bill A4435, introduced in the New Jersey Legislature, amends P.L.2003, c.206 and N.J.S.2C:13-5 to address nonconsensual pornographic deepfake threats and disclosures. It criminalizes both the creation and disclosure of deepfake images without consent, focusing primarily on disclosure. Under Section 1, disclosing such images can be a crime of the third or fourth degree. A third-degree crime involves nonconsensual disclosure of images depicting intimate parts or sexual acts, punishable by imprisonment for three to five years and a fine up to $15,000. A fourth-degree crime involves disclosing deepfake images with reckless disregard, punishable by up to 18 months in prison and a fine up to $10,000. Additionally, a fine not to exceed $30,000 may be imposed for violations of subsection c, which involves the disclosure of images taken in violation of subsection b. The bill also amends N.J.S.2C:13-5 to include threats to disclose deepfake images as criminal coercion. An affirmative defense is available if the actor provided prior notice and acted with a lawful purpose. The bill specifies conditions under which observing or recording in fitting rooms is not a violation, provided notice is posted.
Sponsors
| Name | Role | District |
|---|---|---|
| Andrea Katz D | Sponsor | HD-008 |
Topics and industries
Related topics
Affected industries
This page is general information, not legal advice. Summaries are AI-assisted and may contain errors; read the statute for the controlling text and talk to a lawyer about your situation. Full disclaimer · Report an error