Get emailed when this bill changes status, is amended, or advances.
Disclaimer: This page provides general informational summaries only and does not constitute legal advice. AI-generated content may contain errors. Always consult a qualified attorney for guidance specific to your situation.
Read full disclaimer →
If you use AI for evidence, ensure independent support and expert validation to admit it in court.
State
New York
Bill Number
A08110
Status
Introduced
Risk Level
Medium
Category
Comprehensive
Effective Date
Apr 30, 2025
Last Action
Jan 3, 2024
Last Verified
May 1, 2026
Data Updated
May 1, 2026
What do these statuses mean?▼
Introduced— Filed in the legislature; not yet heard in committee
In Committee— Assigned to and being reviewed by a legislative committee
Passed— Approved by one or both chambers; awaiting further action
Signed / Enacted— Signed into law by the governor; may or may not be in effect yet
Dead / Vetoed— Vetoed, failed to pass, or session expired without action
Unknown— Status data not yet available or awaiting classification
Affected Industries
TechnologyLegalElection Management
What This Means
This bill amends New York's criminal and civil procedure laws to establish criteria for admitting evidence created or processed by AI. It requires independent support and expert validation of AI's reliability.
Key Provisions
Section 60.80: Admissibility of AI-created evidence in criminal proceedings.
Section 4551: Admissibility of AI-created evidence in civil proceedings.
Requirement for independent support and expert validation of AI's reliability.
Latest Legislative Action
referred to codes
Bill Sponsors
Name
Role
District
Alicia HyndmanD
Sponsor
HD-029
Clyde VanelD
Sponsor
HD-033
Dana LevenbergD
Sponsor
HD-095
Deborah GlickD
Sponsor
HD-066
Jacob BlumencranzR
Sponsor
HD-015
Compliance Checklist
Implement electronic verification of voter registration Who: Polling place operators in New York Deadline: Immediately
Bill A08110, introduced in the New York Assembly, proposes amendments to the criminal procedure law and civil practice law regarding the admissibility of evidence created or processed by artificial intelligence. Under the proposed Section 60.80 of the criminal procedure law, AI-created evidence is inadmissible in criminal proceedings unless it is substantially supported by independent and admissible evidence, and the proponent demonstrates the AI's reliability and accuracy. Similarly, Section 4551 of the civil practice law outlines that AI-processed evidence in civil proceedings must meet the same standards. The bill defines AI-created evidence as new information generated by AI from existing data, while AI-processed evidence involves conclusions drawn by AI that are not reasonably deducible from existing information. The bill mandates expert testimony to validate the AI's use, ensuring it has been rigorously tested and is free from variables that could cause inaccuracies. Courts may protect sensitive information during expert testimony to safeguard trade secrets or law enforcement techniques.
We use cookies for analytics to understand how visitors use this site. We also use essential cookies for site functionality.
See our Privacy Policy for details.