Skip to content

Session Expired

Your session has expired. Please sign in again to continue where you left off.

Sign In Again

NY S02698: Requires certification of filings produced using generative artificial intelligence; requires the brief of an appellant to contain a disclosure of th…

In Committee New York · 2025–2026 session

Last verified Oct 12, 2026 · official bill text

S02698 · where it stands

1 of 5 steps complete
  1. Introduced In committee
  2. Passed first chamber
  3. Passed both chambers
  4. Enacted
  5. Effective
What do these statuses mean?
Introduced
Filed in the legislature; may be waiting for a committee hearing.
Passed a chamber
Approved by one or both chambers; awaiting further action.
Enacted
Signed into law, or became law without a signature or over a veto.
Effective date
The date the law says it takes effect. Once it has passed, the page shows "Effective" and the date. A court order can still block a law; if we know of one, the summary says so.
Dead / vetoed
Vetoed, failed, or the session ended without action.
View full title

Requires certification of filings produced using generative artificial intelligence; requires the brief of an appellant to contain a disclosure of the use of generative artificial intelligence in the drafting of the brief and certification that the content therein was reviewed and verified by a…

In one paragraph

New York's S 2698 would add CPLR rule 2107 requiring any paper served that was drafted with the assistance of generative AI to attach a separate affidavit disclosing the use and certifying that a human reviewed the source material and verified the content. It would also amend CPLR rule 5528 to require a disclosure and human-review certification in appellant briefs. Committed to Rules June 13, 2025; it has not passed either chamber.

Plain-English summary, written with AI assistance. The official text controls.

What it means for business

None yet: the bill is pending. If enacted, attorneys and parties serving papers drafted with generative AI in New York courts would have to attach an affidavit disclosing the use and certifying human review.

Key provisions

  1. Rule 2107(a): a paper served that was drafted with generative AI assistance must attach a separate affidavit disclosing the use and certifying a human reviewed the source material and verified the content
  2. Rule 2107(b) defines generative AI broadly as machine learning technology, software, automation and algorithms that perform tasks or make predictions
  3. Rule 2107(c): if no generative AI was used, no disclosure is required
  4. Rule 5528(a)(6): if required by rule 2107, an appellant's brief must include a disclosure of generative AI use and a certification of human review and verification
  5. No penalties, enforcer or private right of action are stated; would take effect on the 90th day after becoming law; Assembly companion A8546; reported by Judiciary May 20, 2025 (16 ayes, 2 ayes with reservations) and advanced to third reading May 22, 2025

Latest legislative action

Jun 13, 2025. COMMITTED TO RULES

Sponsors

NameRole
Primary
Primary
Primary
D Primary
Cosponsor

Roll call votes

Judiciary Vote May 20, 2025

18 yea0 nay1 otherPassed

Related and companion bills

Topics and industries

Related topics

This page is general information, not legal advice. Summaries are AI-assisted and may contain errors; read the statute for the controlling text and talk to a lawyer about your situation. Full disclaimer · Report an error