Skip to content

Session Expired

Your session has expired. Please sign in again to continue where you left off.

Sign In Again

NY S09640: Requires certification of filings produced using generative artificial intelligence; requires the brief of an appellant to contain a disclosure of th…

Dead/Failed New York · 2023–2024 session

Last verified Oct 10, 2026 · official bill text

S09640 · where it stands

This bill did not become law (dead/failed) · last action May 16, 2024.

What do these statuses mean?
Introduced
Filed in the legislature; may be waiting for a committee hearing.
Passed a chamber
Approved by one or both chambers; awaiting further action.
Enacted
Signed into law, or became law without a signature or over a veto.
Effective date
The date the law says it takes effect. Once it has passed, the page shows "Effective" and the date. A court order can still block a law; if we know of one, the summary says so.
Dead / vetoed
Vetoed, failed, or the session ended without action.
View full title

Requires certification of filings produced using generative artificial intelligence; requires the brief of an appellant to contain a disclosure of the use of generative artificial intelligence in the drafting of the brief and certification that the content therein was reviewed and verified by a…

In one paragraph

New York's S 9640 (2023-2024) would have added CPLR rule 2107 requiring any paper served that was drafted with generative AI assistance to attach an affidavit disclosing the use and certifying that a human reviewed the source material and verified the content, and amended CPLR rule 5528 for appellate briefs. Referred to Judiciary May 16, 2024; it died when the 2023-2024 session ended.

Plain-English summary, written with AI assistance. The official text controls.

What it means for business

None: the bill died when the 2023-2024 session ended. The bill never became law; no duties were imposed.

Key provisions

  1. Rule 2107(a): served papers drafted with generative AI assistance must attach a separate affidavit disclosing the use and certifying human review and verification
  2. Rule 2107(b) defines generative AI broadly as machine learning, software, automation and algorithms that perform tasks or make predictions
  3. Rule 2107(c): no disclosure required where no generative AI was used
  4. Rule 5528(a)(6): if required by rule 2107, appellant briefs must include the disclosure and a certification of human review
  5. No penalties, enforcer or private right of action stated; would have taken effect on the 90th day after becoming law; later versions S2698 and S9794 were introduced in 2025-2026

Latest legislative action

May 16, 2024. referred to judiciary

Sponsors

NameRole
Primary
Primary

Related and companion bills

Topics and industries

Related topics

AI Transparency

This page is general information, not legal advice. Summaries are AI-assisted and may contain errors; read the statute for the controlling text and talk to a lawyer about your situation. Full disclaimer · Report an error

Related AI laws in New York

All New York bills →
S06953 Relates to the training and use of artificial intelligence frontier models; defi S00822 Relates to the disclosure of automated employment decision-making tools; require S8828 Relates to transparency and safety requirements for developers of artificial int S07543 Enacts the legislative oversight of automated decision-making in government act LOCALLAW144 Automated Employment Decision Tools (AEDT) Law S03008 Enacts into law major components of legislation necessary to implement the state

Same topic in other states

Maine LD1727 An Act to Ensure Transparency in Consumer Transactions Involving Artificial Inte Washington HB 1170 Informing users when content is developed or modified by artificial intelligence Rhode Island H7538 Requires healthcare providers and healthcare facilities to inform patients of th Nebraska LB77 Adopt the Ensuring Transparency in Prior Authorization Act and provide for insur Vermont S0069 An act relating to an age-appropriate design code Indiana HB1133 Use of digitally altered media in elections