Skip to content

Session Expired

Your session has expired. Please sign in again to continue where you left off.

Sign In Again

NY A08546: Requires certification of filings produced using generative artificial intelligence; requires the brief of an appellant to contain a disclosure of th…

In Committee New York · 2025–2026 session

Last verified Oct 12, 2026 · official bill text

A08546 · where it stands

1 of 5 steps complete
  1. Introduced In committee
  2. Passed first chamber
  3. Passed both chambers
  4. Enacted
  5. Effective
What do these statuses mean?
Introduced
Filed in the legislature; may be waiting for a committee hearing.
Passed a chamber
Approved by one or both chambers; awaiting further action.
Enacted
Signed into law, or became law without a signature or over a veto.
Effective date
The date the law says it takes effect. Once it has passed, the page shows "Effective" and the date. A court order can still block a law; if we know of one, the summary says so.
Dead / vetoed
Vetoed, failed, or the session ended without action.
View full title

Requires certification of filings produced using generative artificial intelligence; requires the brief of an appellant to contain a disclosure of the use of generative artificial intelligence in the drafting of the brief and certification that the content therein was reviewed and verified by a…

In one paragraph

New York's A 8546 would add CPLR Rule 2107, requiring any paper or file served that was drafted with the assistance of generative artificial intelligence to attach a separate affidavit disclosing that use and certifying that a human being has reviewed the source material and verified the content is accurate. CPLR 5528(a) would require the same disclosure in an appellant's brief. Would take effect on the 90th day after it becomes law. Introduced May 20, 2025 and referred to the Judiciary Committee (again January 7, 2026); it has not passed either chamber.

Plain-English summary, written with AI assistance. The official text controls.

What it means for business

None yet: the bill is pending. If enacted, lawyers and parties serving court papers drafted with generative AI would have to attach an affidavit disclosing the use and certifying human verification.

Key provisions

  1. CPLR Rule 2107(A): a paper or file served that was drafted with the assistance of generative AI must attach a separate affidavit disclosing the use and certifying a human reviewed the source material and verified the AI-generated content is accurate
  2. "Generative artificial intelligence" is defined broadly as machine learning technology, software, automation and algorithms performing tasks or making rules or predictions, with five listed categories
  3. Rule 2107(C): where no generative AI was used in drafting, no disclosure is required
  4. CPLR 5528(a)(6) (new): an appellant's brief must include the Rule 2107 disclosure and certification if required
  5. The text states no penalty or private right of action; would take effect on the 90th day after it becomes law; referred to Judiciary, with no further action

Latest legislative action

Jan 7, 2026. referred to judiciary

Sponsors (showing 5 of 6)

NameRole
D Primary
D Primary
Primary
Primary
Primary

Related and companion bills

Topics and industries

Related topics

This page is general information, not legal advice. Summaries are AI-assisted and may contain errors; read the statute for the controlling text and talk to a lawyer about your situation. Full disclaimer · Report an error