View full title
Directing the Joint State Government Commission to establish an advisory committee to conduct a study on the field of artificial intelligence and its impact and potential future impact in Pennsylvania.
In one paragraph
Pennsylvania's House Resolution 170 directs the Joint State Government Commission, with an advisory committee of state officials, House members, labor, civil liberties, academic, AI, medical, business and other experts, to investigate AI, recommend how to grow the state's emerging technology markets and use AI in state government, and study how other states regulate AI. Its report, due 18 months after adoption, covers AI's benefits and risks, possible legislation, a definition of AI, worker and employer rights, disinformation, student use and fraudulent impersonation. Adopted by the House July 3, 2024 (125-77); a resolution of one chamber that does not change the law.
Plain-English summary, written with AI assistance. The official text controls.
What it means for business
No duties for businesses. The resolution orders a legislative study of AI; the Pennsylvania Chamber of Business and Industry has one seat on its advisory committee.
Key provisions
- The Joint State Government Commission investigates the field of AI, recommends on the responsible growth of Pennsylvania's emerging technology markets and AI use in state government, and studies how other states regulate AI
- Advisory committee: six state secretaries, the Adjutant General and the State Police Commissioner (or designees), two House members, two AFL-CIO-recommended labor members, and ACLU, legal, academic, ethics, AI engineer, student, Medical Society and Pennsylvania Chamber members, plus five emerging-technology experts
- Report must assess AI's development, benefits and risks; whether and how to use AI in state government and its fiscal impact; proposed legislation if recommended; a definition of AI; and whether to create a permanent AI commission
- It must also address worker and employer rights in AI implementation, AI-driven disinformation, AI's effect on students' academic records, and the risks of AI used for fraudulent impersonation, with a regulatory recommendation
- The Commission may request non-confidential information from state agencies; report due to legislative leaders and committee chairs no later than 18 months after adoption
- Adopted by the House July 3, 2024 (125-77) as amended; a one-chamber resolution that directs a study and does not change the law
Latest legislative action
Jul 3, 2024. Adopted
Sponsors (showing 5 of 24)
| Name | Role | District |
|---|---|---|
| Arvind Venkat D | Sponsor | HD-030 |
| Ben Sanchez D | Sponsor | HD-153 |
| Brett Miller R | Sponsor | HD-041 |
| Carol Hill-Evans D | Sponsor | HD-095 |
| Christopher Pielli D | Sponsor | HD-156 |
Roll call votes (showing 3 of 5)
H House Floor: HR 170 PN 1789, 2023 A3599 Jul 3, 2024
181 yea21 nay1 otherPassed
H House Floor: HR 170 PN 1789, 2023 A5399 Jul 3, 2024
100 yea102 nay1 other
H House Floor: HR 170 PN 1789, 2023 A5400 Jul 3, 2024
202 yea0 nay1 otherPassed
Amendments (3)
-
House Amendment A05400 (PN 1789) Not adopted
-
House Amendment A05399 (PN 1789) Not adopted
-
House Amendment A03599 (PN 1789) Not adopted
Topics and industries
Related topics
Affected industries
This page is general information, not legal advice. Summaries are AI-assisted and may contain errors; read the statute for the controlling text and talk to a lawyer about your situation. Full disclaimer · Report an error