In one paragraph
Utah's HB 320 revises the existing Office of Artificial Intelligence Policy and its AI Learning Laboratory (Title 13, Chapter 72). Besides regulatory mitigation agreements, which let a participant use AI despite a law or rule that might impede it, the office may sign joint interpretation agreements clarifying how a state law or rule applies to an AI technology. Agreements must set consumer disclosures and audit reporting; the office must audit participants regularly and may end an agreement at any time. Terms run up to 12 months with up to two extensions. Signed March 18, 2026; effective May 6, 2026.
Plain-English summary, written with AI assistance. The official text controls.
What it means for business
Optional for businesses: AI companies may seek a regulatory mitigation or joint interpretation agreement with Utah's Office of AI Policy; those that do must meet its disclosure and reporting terms and accept regular office audits.
Key provisions
- A participant is now a person seeking or holding a regulatory mitigation agreement or joint interpretation agreement with the office; a regulatory mitigation agreement permits use or deployment of AI despite a law or rule that might impede it, with cure periods, reduced civil fines or tailored terms
- New joint interpretation agreements among a participant, the office and a relevant state agency or governmental entity (the judiciary, state-funded higher or public education, or a political subdivision) clarify how a state law or rule applies to the AI technology
- Agreements must specify scope limits, safeguards, any mitigation granted, required consumer disclosures and reporting needed for office audits; the office must regularly audit participants while an agreement is in effect (§ 13-72-401)
- The office may terminate an agreement at any time for any reason; violating participants may be removed and face civil and criminal penalties; the state is not responsible for claims arising from actions taken under an agreement
- An initial demonstration period may not exceed 12 months; participants may request 12-month extensions at least 30 days before the period ends, and the office may grant up to two (§ 13-72-403)
- The annual report to the Business and Labor Interim Committee must cover agreements executed; the office may publish consumer guidance and best practices on AI; repeals § 13-72-304 (participation in the learning laboratory)
- Does not change the chapter's July 1, 2027 repeal date set by SB 332 and SB 226 (2025)
- Signed March 18, 2026; effective May 6, 2026
Latest legislative action
Mar 18, 2026. Governor Signed
Sponsors (showing 5 of 10)
| Name | Role |
|---|---|
| Abbott, Nelson T. | Primary |
| Acton, Cheryl K. | Primary |
| Cutler, Paul A. | Primary |
| Lyman, Phil | Primary |
| Sagers, Douglas V. | Primary |
Topics and industries
Related topics
Affected industries
This page is general information, not legal advice. Summaries are AI-assisted and may contain errors; read the statute for the controlling text and talk to a lawyer about your situation. Full disclaimer · Report an error