Skip to content

Session Expired

Your session has expired. Please sign in again to continue where you left off.

Sign In Again

US HB9309: Unleashing AI Innovation in Financial Services Act

Dead/Failed United States (Federal) · 2023–2024 session

Last verified Oct 10, 2026 · official bill text

HB9309 · where it stands

This bill did not become law (dead/failed) · last action Aug 6, 2024.

What do these statuses mean?
Introduced
Filed in the legislature; may be waiting for a committee hearing.
Passed a chamber
Approved by one or both chambers; awaiting further action.
Enacted
Signed into law, or became law without a signature or over a veto.
Effective date
The date the law says it takes effect. Once it has passed, the page shows "Effective" and the date. A court order can still block a law; if we know of one, the summary says so.
Dead / vetoed
Vetoed, failed, or the session ended without action.

In one paragraph

The federal H.R. 9309 (Unleashing AI Innovation in Financial Services Act) would have required each financial regulatory agency to set up a regulatory sandbox where regulated entities could test AI projects with waivers of rules. Agencies would have had 90 days to decide applications, and an undecided application after a 90-day extension would be deemed approved. Introduced August 6, 2024 and referred to the House Financial Services Committee; it died when the 118th Congress ended on January 3, 2025.

Plain-English summary, written with AI assistance. The official text controls.

What it means for business

None: the bill died when the 118th Congress ended on January 3, 2025 and never became law. Had it passed, financial firms could have applied for AI test sandboxes; it set no duties for them.

Key provisions

  1. The Federal Reserve Board, FDIC, OCC, SEC, CFPB, NCUA and FHFA would each have had to establish a regulatory sandbox for AI test projects without unnecessary or unduly burdensome regulation or expectation of retroactive enforcement actions; the business of insurance is excluded
  2. A regulated entity could apply with a description, an alternative compliance strategy, a demonstration that the project would serve the public interest or similar listed benefits and would not present a systemic or national security risk, a termination date, size limits and an economic impact estimate
  3. The agency would have had to decide within 90 days and approve if the applicant showed it was more likely than not that the requirements were met; the agency could extend by 90 days, after which an undecided application was deemed approved
  4. A denial needed written reasons, and no enforcement could start until 30 days later; fraud enforcement and injunctions against projects posing an immediate danger to consumers were preserved
  5. Within 180 days after enactment each agency would have had to issue regulations after a 45-day comment period; termination dates not earlier than 1 year after approval; annual reports to the Senate Banking and House Financial Services committees
  6. Introduced August 6, 2024 and referred to the House Financial Services Committee; no other action

Latest legislative action

Aug 6, 2024. Referred to the House Committee on Financial Services.

Sponsors

NameRoleDistrict
R Sponsor HD-AR-2
D Sponsor HD-NY-15

Topics and industries

Affected industries

This page is general information, not legal advice. Summaries are AI-assisted and may contain errors; read the statute for the controlling text and talk to a lawyer about your situation. Full disclaimer · Report an error