Skip to content

Session Expired

Your session has expired. Please sign in again to continue where you left off.

Sign In Again

VA HB1252: Virginia Residential Landlord and Tenant Act; algorithmic pricing device use by certain landlords.

In Committee Virginia

Last verified Oct 23, 2026 · official bill text

HB1252 · where it stands

1 of 5 steps complete
  1. Introduced In committee
  2. Passed first chamber
  3. Passed both chambers
  4. Enacted
  5. Effective
What do these statuses mean?
Introduced
Filed in the legislature; may be waiting for a committee hearing.
Passed a chamber
Approved by one or both chambers; awaiting further action.
Enacted
Signed into law, or became law without a signature or over a veto.
Effective date
The date the law says it takes effect. Once it has passed, the page shows "Effective" and the date. A court order can still block a law; if we know of one, the summary says so.
Dead / vetoed
Vetoed, failed, or the session ended without action.

In one paragraph

Virginia's HB 1252 (as introduced) would add Code § 55.1-1204.2. A landlord with more than 10 rental dwelling units (or more than a 10 percent interest in more than 10) who uses an algorithmic pricing device to set advertised, renewal or offered rent would have to disclose that use in writing, give a plain-language summary of factors on request, and allow human review of rent determinations. The Attorney General could seek an injunction and civil penalties up to $1,000 per violation. Continued to 2027 in the House General Laws Committee on February 3, 2026; it has not passed either house.

Plain-English summary, written with AI assistance. The official text controls.

What it means for business

None yet: the bill has not been enacted. If enacted, larger landlords using rent-pricing software would have to disclose it, explain its factors on request and offer human review.

Key provisions

  1. Applies to a landlord who owns more than 10 rental dwelling units, or more than a 10 percent interest in more than 10, in Virginia
  2. A landlord using an algorithmic pricing device to establish advertised rent, renewal rent or rent offered to a prospective tenant would have to disclose the use in writing, stating that one was used and naming the software, platform or service, before a written rental agreement is signed (or before occupancy under an oral agreement)
  3. On request, the landlord would give a plain-language summary of the general factors the device considers, without having to disclose proprietary formulas, source code or weighting of inputs
  4. On request, a tenant or prospective tenant would be entitled to a human review of any rent determination or renewal increase generated or recommended by the device
  5. A landlord would not misrepresent use of a device, advertise a rent as nonnegotiable solely because a device produced it, or use a device in a deceptive or misleading way
  6. The Attorney General could seek an injunction and civil penalties of up to $1,000 for each violation; no private right of action
  7. Status: continued to 2027 in House General Laws on February 3, 2026 (subcommittee recommended continuing); not passed by either chamber

Latest legislative action

Feb 3, 2026. Continued to 2027 in General Laws (Voice Vote)

Sponsors (showing 5 of 15)

NameRole
D Primary
D Primary
D Primary
D Primary
R Primary

Related and companion bills

Topics and industries

Affected industries

This page is general information, not legal advice. Summaries are AI-assisted and may contain errors; read the statute for the controlling text and talk to a lawyer about your situation. Full disclaimer · Report an error