Skip to content

Session Expired

Your session has expired. Please sign in again to continue where you left off.

Sign In Again

VA SB585: Virginia Fair Housing Law, et al.; personalized algorithmic pricing disclosures, prohibitions.

Dead/Failed Virginia · 2026 session

Last verified Oct 8, 2026 · official bill text

SB585 · where it stands

This bill did not become law (dead/failed) · last action Feb 4, 2026.

What do these statuses mean?
Introduced
Filed in the legislature; may be waiting for a committee hearing.
Passed a chamber
Approved by one or both chambers; awaiting further action.
Enacted
Signed into law, or became law without a signature or over a veto.
Effective date
The date the law says it takes effect. Once it has passed, the page shows "Effective" and the date. A court order can still block a law; if we know of one, the summary says so.
Dead / vetoed
Vetoed, failed, or the session ended without action.

In one paragraph

Virginia's SB 585 as introduced would require disclosure of personalized algorithmic pricing by residential property owners, landlords and multiple listing services, ban using protected class data to set housing prices, and bar landlords from using coordinating algorithmic software to set rents or facilitate agreements not to compete. Prefiled January 14, 2026; the Senate General Laws and Technology Committee passed it by indefinitely (15-0) February 4, 2026, so it did not pass.

Plain-English summary, written with AI assistance. The official text controls.

What it means for business

None: the bill did not pass. It would have covered landlords, property owners and multiple listing services using algorithmic pricing or rent-setting software.

Key provisions

  1. New Code § 55.1-708.3: an owner of residential real property who knowingly advertises personalized algorithmic pricing using personal data must include the notice "THIS PRICE WAS SET BY AN ALGORITHM USING YOUR PERSONAL DATA"
  2. Amends § 36-96.3 (Fair Housing Law): unlawful to use protected class data to set a price for, offer, market or advertise a dwelling sale or rental if it denies privileges or yields different prices based on that data
  3. New § 55.1-1204.2 (landlord and tenant): same disclosure for landlords and multiple listing services, same protected-class data ban (with an exception for noncommercial bias audits)
  4. Landlords could not knowingly or recklessly facilitate an agreement not to compete, including through software that performs a coordinating function (exempting natural persons with four or fewer units), and landlords and multiple listing services could not set rent or terms based on a coordinating algorithm's recommendations
  5. The Attorney General could seek an injunction and a civil penalty of up to $1,000 per violation; an injured individual could sue for actual damages or $1,000 statutory damages, whichever is greater, plus attorney fees
  6. A Senate subcommittee substitute offered January 28, 2026 would have been limited to the Residential Landlord and Tenant Act (new § 55.1-1204.2)

Latest legislative action

Feb 4, 2026. Passed by indefinitely in General Laws and Technology with letter (15-Y 0-N)

Sponsors (showing 5 of 14)

NameRole
Primary
R Primary
Primary
Primary
D Primary

Roll call votes

Passed by indefinitely in General Laws and Technology with letter Feb 4, 2026

15 yea0 nayPassed

Related and companion bills

Topics and industries

Affected industries

This page is general information, not legal advice. Summaries are AI-assisted and may contain errors; read the statute for the controlling text and talk to a lawyer about your situation. Full disclaimer · Report an error