IA SSB3118: A bill for an act relating to utilization review organizations' use of artificial intelligence, prior authorization determinations and exemptions, an…
Verified
Get emailed when this bill changes status, is amended, or advances.
Disclaimer: This page provides general informational summaries only and does not constitute legal advice. AI-generated content may contain errors. Always consult a qualified attorney for guidance specific to your situation.
Read full disclaimer →
A bill for an act relating to utilization review organizations' use of artificial intelligence, prior authorization determinations and exemptions, and prepayment audits, and including applicability provisions.(See SF 2421.)
AI Summary
This bill regulates utilization review organizations' use of AI in prior authorization processes and establishes peer review requirements, with applicability provisions until 2027.
If you operate a utilization review organization in Iowa, you must ensure AI is not the sole basis for denying prior authorizations by January 1, 2027.
State
Iowa
Bill Number
SSB3118
Status
Introduced
Risk Level
High
Category
Comprehensive
Effective Date
Jan 1, 2027
Last Action
Feb 19, 2026
Last Verified
May 18, 2026
Data Updated
May 24, 2026
What do these statuses mean?▼
Introduced— Filed in the legislature; not yet heard in committee
In Committee— Assigned to and being reviewed by a legislative committee
Passed— Approved by one or both chambers; awaiting further action
Signed / Enacted— Signed into law by the governor; may or may not be in effect yet
Dead / Vetoed— Vetoed, failed to pass, or session expired without action
Unknown— Status data not yet available or awaiting classification
Senate Study Bill 3118 outlines the permissible use of artificial intelligence by utilization review organizations in Iowa. It mandates that AI cannot solely determine the denial or downgrade of prior authorization requests. The bill also introduces peer review requirements and exemptions for cancer-related services, impacting healthcare providers and insurers.
Key Provisions
UROs may use AI for initial prior authorization reviews but cannot solely rely on it for decisions on medical necessity.
Denials or downgrades must be made by qualified reviewers or clinical peers.
UROs must provide written explanations for adverse decisions, including appeals processes.
Cancer-related screenings are exempt from prior authorization if recommended by a healthcare professional.
Latest Legislative Action
Committee report approving bill, renumbered as SF 2421.
Bill Sponsors
Name
Role
Health And Human Services
Sponsor
Compliance Checklist
Ensure AI is not the sole basis for prior authorization decisions. Who: Utilization review organizations Deadline: By January 1, 2027 Penalty: Claims may be automatically approved if non-compliant.
Provide written explanations for any denial or downgrade of prior authorization requests. Who: Utilization review organizations Deadline: Upon making a denial or downgrade decision Penalty: Potential regulatory penalties and automatic claim approvals.
Senate Study Bill 3118 establishes guidelines for the use of artificial intelligence by utilization review organizations (UROs) in Iowa. It permits UROs to use AI algorithms for initial reviews of prior authorization requests but prohibits using AI as the sole basis for decisions to deny, delay, or downgrade requests based on medical necessity. The bill also mandates that any denial or downgrade must be made by a qualified reviewer or clinical peer, ensuring that human oversight is maintained in the decision-making process. The bill applies to requests for prior authorization made before January 1, 2027, if not finally determined by that date, with specific provisions for cancer-related screenings exempting them from prior authorization requirements if recommended by a healthcare professional. UROs must provide detailed written explanations for any adverse decisions, including the rationale and appeals process, to the requesting healthcare provider. The bill also empowers the commissioner of insurance to adopt rules for enforcement, ensuring that UROs are held accountable for their practices regarding AI use and prior authorization processes.
We use cookies for analytics to understand how visitors use this site. We also use essential cookies for site functionality.
See our Privacy Policy for details.