In one paragraph
Vetoed. Arizona's SB 1336 (2024) would have added A.R.S. § 13-3508, making it a crime to intentionally disseminate a deepfake recording or image that realistically depicts an identifiable person's intimate parts (real or generated by synthetic media) or the person engaging in a sexual act, when the person who created and disseminated it knew or reasonably should have known the person did not consent. It would have been a class 6 felony, or a class 4 felony in cases such as posting it online, intent to profit or harass, or a prior conviction. The Governor vetoed it May 29, 2024, calling it duplicative of SB 1078.
Plain-English summary, written with AI assistance. The official text controls.
What it means for business
None: the bill was vetoed and never became law. It would have made creating and disseminating nonconsensual sexual deepfakes a felony, while shielding interactive computer services from liability for content created by others.
Key provisions
- Would have made it unlawful to intentionally disseminate a deepfake recording or image if the person who intentionally created and disseminated it knew or reasonably should have known that the depicted individual did not consent
- Covered content: realistic depictions of another person's intimate parts presented as the depicted individual's, intimate parts generated by synthetic media presented as the depicted individual's, or the depicted individual engaging in a sexual act; the individual had to be identifiable from the image, by the individual, or from personal information displayed with it
- Deepfake recording or image: a recording, film, image or photograph (or a technological representation substantially derived from one) that appears to authentically depict speech or conduct the individual did not engage in, produced substantially by technical means rather than impersonation
- Class 6 felony; class 4 felony if the depicted person suffered financial loss, or the person acted with intent to profit or to harass, maintained a website or app to disseminate it, posted it on a website, obtained it by theft, criminal trespass, computer tampering or unauthorized computer access, or had a prior conviction
- Interactive computer services would not have been liable for content created or developed by another person or entity
- Passed the House (40-17, May 15, 2024) and the Senate on final reading (17-9, May 22, 2024); vetoed May 29, 2024, with a veto message saying it significantly overlapped with SB 1078 and was duplicative
Latest legislative action
May 29, 2024. Vetoed by Governor
Sponsors (showing 5 of 20)
| Name | Role |
|---|---|
| David Gowan R | Primary |
| Frank Carroll R | Primary |
| Heather Carter | Primary |
| Janae Shamp R | Primary |
| Juan Mendez | Primary |
Roll call votes
Passed May 22, 2024
17 yea9 nay4 otherPassed
Passed May 15, 2024
40 yea17 nay3 otherPassed
Passed Mar 11, 2024
21 yea7 nay2 otherPassed
Amendments (2)
-
HOUSE - Judiciary Adopted 2024-03-20
-
HOUSE - Judiciary Not adopted 2024-03-19
Topics and industries
Related topics
Affected industries
This page is general information, not legal advice. Summaries are AI-assisted and may contain errors; read the statute for the controlling text and talk to a lawyer about your situation. Full disclaimer · Report an error