Skip to content

Session Expired

Your session has expired. Please sign in again to continue where you left off.

Sign In Again

CA SB52: Housing rental terms: algorithmic devices.

Dead/Failed California

Last verified Oct 11, 2026 · official bill text

SB52 · where it stands

This bill did not become law (dead/failed) · last action Aug 29, 2025.

What do these statuses mean?
Introduced
Filed in the legislature; may be waiting for a committee hearing.
Passed a chamber
Approved by one or both chambers; awaiting further action.
Enacted
Signed into law, or became law without a signature or over a veto.
Effective date
The date the law says it takes effect. Once it has passed, the page shows "Effective" and the date. A court order can still block a law; if we know of one, the summary says so.
Dead / vetoed
Vetoed, failed, or the session ended without action.

In one paragraph

California's SB 52 (2025-26 Regular Session) would have made it unlawful to sell, license or provide a rental pricing algorithm to 2 or more persons expecting it to be used to set residential rental terms, to use one to recommend terms if the person knew or should have known it would be used by 2 or more landlords in the same or a related market, or to set terms based on one that processes nonpublic competitor data, as specified. The Senate passed it 28-9 on June 2, 2025; it was held in Assembly Appropriations on August 29, 2025 and was not passed before the session ended.

Plain-English summary, written with AI assistance. The official text controls.

What it means for business

None: the bill died and never became law. It would have barred landlords and software vendors from certain uses of rental pricing algorithms that process nonpublic competitor data.

Key provisions

  1. Would add Section 1947.16 to the Civil Code
  2. Unlawful to sell, license or otherwise provide a rental pricing algorithm to 2 or more persons with the intent or reasonable expectation it will be used to set rental terms for residential premises
  3. Unlawful to use a rental pricing algorithm to recommend rental terms if the person knew or should have known it would be used by 2 or more landlords in the same or a related market, or to coerce another person to use it to set rental terms in the same or a related market
  4. Unlawful to set or adopt rental terms based on a recommendation if the person knows or should know the algorithm processes nonpublic competitor data and was used by another person in the same or a related market
  5. Attorney General, and the city attorney or county counsel where the unit is located, could file civil actions, as specified
  6. Status: held in committee and under submission August 29, 2025; no later action before the session ended

Latest legislative action

Aug 29, 2025. August 29 hearing: Held in committee and under submission.

Sponsors (showing 5 of 89)

NameRole
Coauthor
Coauthor
Coauthor
Coauthor
Coauthor

Roll call votes (showing 3 of 6)

Do pass as amended and be re-referred to the Committee on [Appropriations] Jul 16, 2025

10 yea4 nay1 otherPassed

Do pass and be re-referred to the Committee on [Privacy and Consumer Protection] Jul 1, 2025

9 yea3 nayPassed

3rd Reading Jun 2, 2025

28 yea9 nay3 otherPassed

Topics and industries

Related topics

Affected industries

This page is general information, not legal advice. Summaries are AI-assisted and may contain errors; read the statute for the controlling text and talk to a lawyer about your situation. Full disclaimer · Report an error