Skip to content

Session Expired

Your session has expired. Please sign in again to continue where you left off.

Sign In Again

GA HB715: Fair and Future Ready Housing Act; enact

Dead/Failed Georgia · 2025–2026 session

Last verified Oct 11, 2026 · official bill text

HB715 · where it stands

This bill did not become law (dead/failed) · last action Mar 6, 2025.

What do these statuses mean?
Introduced
Filed in the legislature; may be waiting for a committee hearing.
Passed a chamber
Approved by one or both chambers; awaiting further action.
Enacted
Signed into law, or became law without a signature or over a veto.
Effective date
The date the law says it takes effect. Once it has passed, the page shows "Effective" and the date. A court order can still block a law; if we know of one, the summary says so.
Dead / vetoed
Vetoed, failed, or the session ended without action.

In one paragraph

Georgia's HB 715, the Fair and Future Ready Housing Act, would add Code section 8-3-224 to the fair housing law. Discriminatory housing practices resulting from AI or automated decision tools would be prohibited, reliance on such tools would not be a defense, and no person could use them to make sale, rental or financing determinations without individual review or without disclosing their use. After notice and hearing, the Attorney General could impose a penalty of up to $10,000 for violating subsection (c) or (d). The bill reached House Second Readers on March 6, 2025 and died when the session ended.

Plain-English summary, written with AI assistance. The official text controls.

What it means for business

None: the bill did not pass. Had it been enacted, landlords, lenders, brokers and others using AI in housing decisions would have needed human review and disclosure, with Attorney General penalties up to $10,000 for lacking human review.

Key provisions

  1. Would extend existing fair-housing prohibitions to discriminatory practices resulting from use of or reliance on AI or automated decision tools
  2. Would bar reliance on AI or automated decision tools as a defense to a discrimination allegation
  3. Would bar using such tools for sale, rental, financing or brokerage determinations without participation or review by an individual responsible for the determination
  4. Would bar using such tools for those determinations without disclosing their use to affected individuals
  5. Would let the Attorney General, after notice and hearing, issue an administrative order imposing a penalty of not more than $10,000 for violating subsection (c) (no-defense rule) or (d) (human review); the text does not tie the penalty to the disclosure rule in (e)
  6. Last action: House Second Readers on March 6, 2025; dead

Latest legislative action

Mar 6, 2025. House Second Readers; died when the Georgia General Assembly's 2025-2026 session ended April 2, 2026

Sponsors (showing 5 of 26)

NameRole
R Primary
Primary
Primary
D Primary
R Primary

Topics and industries

This page is general information, not legal advice. Summaries are AI-assisted and may contain errors; read the statute for the controlling text and talk to a lawyer about your situation. Full disclaimer · Report an error