Skip to content

Session Expired

Your session has expired. Please sign in again to continue where you left off.

Sign In Again

GA HB887: Insurance; use of artificial intelligence in making certain decisions regarding coverage; prohibit

Dead/Failed Georgia · 2023–2024 session

Last verified Oct 11, 2026 · official bill text

HB887 · where it stands

This bill did not become law (dead/failed) · last action Jan 11, 2024.

What do these statuses mean?
Introduced
Filed in the legislature; may be waiting for a committee hearing.
Passed a chamber
Approved by one or both chambers; awaiting further action.
Enacted
Signed into law, or became law without a signature or over a veto.
Effective date
The date the law says it takes effect. Once it has passed, the page shows "Effective" and the date. A court order can still block a law; if we know of one, the summary says so.
Dead / vetoed
Vetoed, failed, or the session ended without action.

In one paragraph

Georgia's HB 887 (2023-2024 session) would have barred coverage determinations, healthcare actions and public-assistance decisions based solely on the results of AI or automated decision tools, and required that such decisions be meaningfully reviewed by an individual with authority to override the tool. It would also have required the Georgia Composite Medical Board to adopt rules, including for disciplining physicians who do not comply. The bill reached House Second Readers on January 11, 2024 and died when the 2023-2024 session ended.

Plain-English summary, written with AI assistance. The official text controls.

What it means for business

None: the bill did not pass. Had it been enacted, insurers, physicians and state public-assistance agencies using AI in coverage, care or benefit decisions would have needed human review that can override the tool.

Key provisions

  1. Would add 33-24-59.34: no coverage determination based solely on AI or automated decision tools, with meaningful review by an individual who can override the tool under each insurer's procedures
  2. Would add 43-34-16: no healthcare action based solely on AI or automated decision tools, with meaningful review by an individual who can override the tool
  3. Would require the Georgia Composite Medical Board to adopt rules to implement that section, including disciplining a physician who fails to comply
  4. Would revise 49-4-11 to bar award, denial, reduction or termination of public assistance based solely on AI or automated decision tools, with meaningful human review
  5. Last action: House Second Readers on January 11, 2024; dead

Latest legislative action

Jan 11, 2024. House Second Readers

Sponsors

NameRoleDistrict
D Sponsor HD-065

Topics and industries

Related topics

AI in InsuranceAI HealthcareAutomated Decision-Making

Affected industries

FinanceHealthcare

This page is general information, not legal advice. Summaries are AI-assisted and may contain errors; read the statute for the controlling text and talk to a lawyer about your situation. Full disclaimer · Report an error

Related AI laws in Georgia

All Georgia bills →
SB 444 Private Review Agents; certain decisions with regard to the provision of insuran HB203 Health; restrictions on sale and dispensing of contact lenses with respect to ph SB167 Commerce and Trade; private entities that employ certain AI systems to guard aga HB715 Fair and Future Ready Housing Act; enact SB164 Trade Practices; surveillance based price discrimination and surveillance based HB1009 Motor vehicles; use of personal delivery devices to transport cargo; authorize

Same topic in other states

Alabama SB 63 Health care plans; to regulate the use of artificial intelligence in determinati Nebraska LB77 Adopt the Ensuring Transparency in Prior Authorization Act and provide for insur Maryland HB820 Health Insurance - Utilization Review - Use of Artificial Intelligence Illinois SB3114 TRANSPARENCY IN DOWNCODING ACT Washington SB5395 Making improvements to transparency and accountability in the prior authorizatio Minnesota HF4188 Commerce policy bill (Laws 2026, chapter 124), including article 3, section 6 ba