Skip to content

Session Expired

Your session has expired. Please sign in again to continue where you left off.

Sign In Again

GA SB167: Commerce and Trade; private entities that employ certain AI systems to guard against discrimination caused by such systems; provide

Dead/Failed Georgia · 2025–2026 session

Last verified Oct 11, 2026 · official bill text

SB167 · where it stands

This bill did not become law (dead/failed) · last action Feb 13, 2025.

What do these statuses mean?
Introduced
Filed in the legislature; may be waiting for a committee hearing.
Passed a chamber
Approved by one or both chambers; awaiting further action.
Enacted
Signed into law, or became law without a signature or over a veto.
Effective date
The date the law says it takes effect. Once it has passed, the page shows "Effective" and the date. A court order can still block a law; if we know of one, the summary says so.
Dead / vetoed
Vetoed, failed, or the session ended without action.

In one paragraph

Georgia's SB 167 would add a new Chapter 16 to Title 10 regulating automated decision systems used for consequential decisions (education, employment, essential government services, financial or lending services, healthcare, housing, insurance and legal services). Developers could not make available a system that results in algorithmic discrimination and would have to provide information to the Attorney General. According to its title, deployers would also have duties, and the Attorney General would enforce. The bill was read and referred on February 13, 2025 and died when the session ended.

Plain-English summary, written with AI assistance. The official text controls.

What it means for business

None: the bill did not pass. Had it been enacted, developers and deployers of automated decision systems used in consequential decisions affecting Georgia consumers would have faced anti-discrimination and disclosure duties.

Key provisions

  1. Would define 'algorithmic discrimination' as use of an AI system that discriminates or causes disparate impact in a consequential decision on protected grounds, with self-testing and diversity-expansion carve-outs
  2. Would bar developers from selling or making available to deployers an automated decision system that results in algorithmic discrimination (10-16-2(a))
  3. Except as otherwise provided, would require developers to give the Attorney General information including a statement of reasonably foreseeable uses and known harmful or inappropriate uses, the purpose and intended benefits, and high-level summaries of the types of training data (captured text is truncated after this point)
  4. According to its title, would also provide for deployer evaluations, consumer notices, trade secret protections, rule making, an open-records exemption and Attorney General enforcement
  5. Last action: Senate Read and Referred on February 13, 2025; dead

Latest legislative action

Feb 13, 2025. Senate Read and Referred; died when the Georgia General Assembly's 2025-2026 session ended April 2, 2026

Sponsors (showing 5 of 48)

NameRole
Primary
R Primary
R Primary
Primary
R Primary

Topics and industries

This page is general information, not legal advice. Summaries are AI-assisted and may contain errors; read the statute for the controlling text and talk to a lawyer about your situation. Full disclaimer · Report an error