Skip to content

Session Expired

Your session has expired. Please sign in again to continue where you left off.

Sign In Again

HI HB1787: Relating To Health Care.

Dead/Failed Hawaii · 2026 session

Last verified Oct 10, 2026 · official bill text

HB1787 · where it stands

This bill did not become law (dead/failed) · last action Jan 26, 2026.

What do these statuses mean?
Introduced
Filed in the legislature; may be waiting for a committee hearing.
Passed a chamber
Approved by one or both chambers; awaiting further action.
Enacted
Signed into law, or became law without a signature or over a veto.
Effective date
The date the law says it takes effect. Once it has passed, the page shows "Effective" and the date. A court order can still block a law; if we know of one, the summary says so.
Dead / vetoed
Vetoed, failed, or the session ended without action.

In one paragraph

Hawaii's House Bill 1787 (2026) would have set rules for health carriers and utilization review organizations that use AI, algorithms or other software tools in utilization review: determinations would have to rest on individual clinical history, be open to commissioner inspection and be reviewed at least quarterly. It would also have barred using these tools to deny, delay or modify care, and required a licensed provider to review adverse actions. It was referred to committees January 26, 2026 and not enacted.

Plain-English summary, written with AI assistance. The official text controls.

What it means for business

None: the bill was not enacted. If enacted, health carriers and utilization review organizations would have been barred from using AI tools to deny care and required provider review of adverse actions.

Key provisions

  1. Would have required determinations to rest on the enrollee's clinical history and circumstances, not solely a group dataset, with consistent application and inspection by the insurance commissioner
  2. Would have required performance, use and outcomes reviews at least quarterly and a written disclosure of the tool's use in each Hawaii policy
  3. Would have barred carriers and utilization review organizations from using AI, algorithms or software tools to deny, delay or modify a determination to provide health care services
  4. Would have required a licensed health care provider to independently review an adverse action, including a prior authorization denial, using independent medical judgment
  5. No penalty is stated; introduced and passed first reading January 22, 2026; referred to HLT, ECD, CPC January 26, 2026; effective upon approval

Latest legislative action

Jan 26, 2026. Referred to HLT, ECD, CPC, referral sheet 1

Sponsors (showing 5 of 32)

NameRole
Primary
Primary
Primary
Primary
Primary

Related and companion bills

Topics and industries

Affected industries

This page is general information, not legal advice. Summaries are AI-assisted and may contain errors; read the statute for the controlling text and talk to a lawyer about your situation. Full disclaimer · Report an error