HI HR48: Urging The Leadership Of The Department Of Law Enforcement To Periodically Undergo Training On Crimes Relating To Artificial Intelligence Technology.
Verified
Get emailed when this bill changes status, is amended, or advances.
Disclaimer: This page provides general informational summaries only and does not constitute legal advice. AI-generated content may contain errors. Always consult a qualified attorney for guidance specific to your situation.
Read full disclaimer →
H.R. 48 calls for the leadership of Hawaii's Department of Law Enforcement to receive periodic training on crimes involving artificial intelligence. This initiative aims to prepare law enforcement for the anticipated rise in AI-related criminal activities. The bill emphasizes the importance of understanding technologies like deepfakes and their implications for law enforcement.
Key Provisions
Urges training for law enforcement leadership on AI-related crimes.
Training to include topics like deepfakes and related technologies.
Training recommended at least every two years.
Latest Legislative Action
Referred to JHA, FIN, referral sheet 18
Bill Sponsors
Name
Role
District
Diamond GarciaR
Sponsor
HD-042
Compliance Checklist
Undergo training on AI-related crimes Who: Director, Deputy Directors, and Administrators of the Department of Law Enforcement Deadline: Every two years
H.R. 48 urges the Director, Deputy Directors, and Administrators of the Department of Law Enforcement in Hawaii to undergo training focused on crimes related to artificial intelligence technology, including deepfakes and similar technologies. The resolution suggests that this training should occur at least every two years, reflecting the growing importance of AI in both societal advancements and criminal activities. While the bill does not impose penalties for non-compliance, it highlights the necessity for law enforcement to stay updated on evolving technologies and their potential misuse. This proactive approach aims to equip law enforcement with the necessary skills to effectively investigate and address AI-related crimes. The bill does not specify a compliance deadline or effective date, as it is a resolution rather than a statutory requirement. However, it sets a precedent for future legislative actions that may formalize such training requirements.
We use cookies for analytics to understand how visitors use this site. We also use essential cookies for site functionality.
See our Privacy Policy for details.