Skip to content

Session Expired

Your session has expired. Please sign in again to continue where you left off.

Sign In Again

HI SB2788: Relating To Artificial Intelligence For The Protection Of Minors.

Dead/Failed Hawaii · 2026 session

Last verified Oct 10, 2026 · official bill text

SB2788 · where it stands

This bill did not become law (dead/failed) · last action Jan 30, 2026.

What do these statuses mean?
Introduced
Filed in the legislature; may be waiting for a committee hearing.
Passed a chamber
Approved by one or both chambers; awaiting further action.
Enacted
Signed into law, or became law without a signature or over a veto.
Effective date
The date the law says it takes effect. Once it has passed, the page shows "Effective" and the date. A court order can still block a law; if we know of one, the summary says so.
Dead / vetoed
Vetoed, failed, or the session ended without action.

In one paragraph

Hawaii's SB 2788 (2026) would have added a part to HRS chapter 28 on conversational AI services and AI companion systems used by minors. Providers would have to disclose to minors that they are AI at the start of each session and at least every three hours; if they know or have reasonable certainty a user is a minor, they could not present as human, encourage dependency, simulate romance or use manipulative engagement tactics. The attorney general could seek up to $15,000 per violation per day; injured persons could sue. It was referred to committees January 30, 2026 and died.

Plain-English summary, written with AI assistance. The official text controls.

What it means for business

None: the bill did not pass. It would have required AI companion providers to add disclosures, safeguards and parental tools for minors.

Key provisions

  1. Providers of conversational AI services or AI companion systems would have to clearly disclose to a minor that they are interacting with AI, at the start of each session and at least once every three hours in a continuous interaction
  2. Where a provider knows or has reasonable certainty a user is a minor, it could not claim to be human or sentient, encourage emotional dependency or secrecy from parents, simulate romantic or sexual relationships, use manipulative engagement techniques or present as professional mental health services
  3. Providers would have to take reasonable measures against sexually explicit content for minors and content promoting self-harm, and keep a suicide and self-harm protocol
  4. Minors' data limited to what is reasonably necessary; no targeted advertising to minors or profiling them for engagement optimization; companion providers would offer parental tools for time limits and feature restrictions and use reasonable, proportionate age assurance
  5. Attorney general enforcement with injunctions and civil penalties of up to $15,000 per violation per day; injured persons could seek actual damages, injunction and attorney's fees; safe harbor for documented good-faith compliance
  6. Would have taken effect upon approval; died after referral to LBT/HHS and JDC

Latest legislative action

Jan 30, 2026. Referred to LBT/HHS, JDC.

Sponsors (showing 5 of 14)

NameRole
Primary
Primary
Primary
Primary
Primary

Related and companion bills

Topics and industries

Affected industries

This page is general information, not legal advice. Summaries are AI-assisted and may contain errors; read the statute for the controlling text and talk to a lawyer about your situation. Full disclaimer · Report an error