Skip to content

Session Expired

Your session has expired. Please sign in again to continue where you left off.

Sign In Again

MD SB906: Education - Artificial Intelligence - Guidelines, Professional Development, and Task Force

Dead/Failed Maryland · 2025 session

Last verified Oct 10, 2026 · official bill text

SB906 · where it stands

This bill did not become law (dead/failed) · last action Mar 4, 2025.

What do these statuses mean?
Introduced
Filed in the legislature; may be waiting for a committee hearing.
Passed a chamber
Approved by one or both chambers; awaiting further action.
Enacted
Signed into law, or became law without a signature or over a veto.
Effective date
The date the law says it takes effect. Once it has passed, the page shows "Effective" and the date. A court order can still block a law; if we know of one, the summary says so.
Dead / vetoed
Vetoed, failed, or the session ended without action.

In one paragraph

Maryland's SB 906 (2025) would have added Education Article subtitle 22 (sections 7-2201 to 7-2203): by August 1, 2026 the State Department of Education would develop K-12 guidance on classroom AI use, publish separate guidance for students, teachers and administrators, keep a list of approved AI tools, assess local systems, and receive county AI reports; a Task Force on AI in K-12 Education would report by December 1, 2026. It was referred to the Senate Education, Energy, and the Environment Committee with a hearing set for March 7, 2025, and died when the session ended.

Plain-English summary, written with AI assistance. The official text controls.

What it means for business

None: the bill died when the 2025 session ended. It would have placed duties on the State Department of Education and county school boards, not on private businesses.

Key provisions

  1. Department of Education would have had to, by August 1, 2026, develop or update K-12 guidance on classroom AI use, and publish separate guidance for students, teachers and administrators on its website
  2. With the Department of Information Technology, it would have created and annually updated a list of commonly available AI tools approved for schools that safeguard privacy and security
  3. Each county board would have designated an employee to facilitate productive and ethical AI use; beginning July 1, 2026 and each July 1, county boards would have reported to the Department on AI products bought, AI use by teachers and students, student performance results tied to AI, and data privacy compliance
  4. By October 1, 2025 the CTE Committee would have ensured AI literacy is part of workforce preparation; the Department would have run a statewide needs assessment and reported to the General Assembly by August 1, 2026
  5. Task Force on AI in K-12 Education: study local AI uses, create a document of curriculum examples by January 1, 2026, and report by December 1, 2026; it would end January 31, 2027
  6. Cross-filed with HB 1391; no penalties or enforcer; funding as provided in the State budget; effective June 1, 2025

Latest legislative action

Mar 4, 2025. Hearing 3/07 at 9:00 a.m.

Sponsors

NameRoleDistrict
D Sponsor SD-009

Related and companion bills

Topics and industries

Related topics

Affected industries

This page is general information, not legal advice. Summaries are AI-assisted and may contain errors; read the statute for the controlling text and talk to a lawyer about your situation. Full disclaimer · Report an error