Skip to content

Session Expired

Your session has expired. Please sign in again to continue where you left off.

Sign In Again

MD HB1391: Education - Artificial Intelligence - Guidelines and Professional Development

Dead/Failed Maryland · 2025 session

Last verified Oct 10, 2026 · official bill text

HB1391 · where it stands

This bill did not become law (dead/failed) · last action Mar 17, 2025.

What do these statuses mean?
Introduced
Filed in the legislature; may be waiting for a committee hearing.
Passed a chamber
Approved by one or both chambers; awaiting further action.
Enacted
Signed into law, or became law without a signature or over a veto.
Effective date
The date the law says it takes effect. Once it has passed, the page shows "Effective" and the date. A court order can still block a law; if we know of one, the summary says so.
Dead / vetoed
Vetoed, failed, or the session ended without action.

In one paragraph

Maryland's HB 1391 (2025, third reader) would have added Education Article subtitle 22 (sections 7-2201 to 7-2203) on artificial intelligence in schools: the State Department of Education would develop and periodically update K-12 guidance on classroom AI use and promote AI training, and the CTE committees would have to use that guidance before adding AI to career and technical education plans. It passed the House 128-11 and was referred to a Senate committee March 17, 2025; it died when the session ended.

Plain-English summary, written with AI assistance. The official text controls.

What it means for business

None: the bill died when the 2025 session ended. It would have placed duties on the State Department of Education and CTE committees, not on private businesses.

Key provisions

  1. Would have required the State Department of Education, with relevant stakeholders, to develop, publish and periodically update K-12 guidance on classroom use and implementation of artificial intelligence
  2. The CTE Committee, before incorporating AI into the statewide CTE framework, and the CTE Skills Standards Advisory Committee, before recommending a post-CCR CTE pathway, would have had to use the Department's guidance and could consult it
  3. The Department would have promoted AI training and workforce development; funding for professional development would be as provided in the State budget
  4. A House amendment removed the first-reader task force and county needs-assessment provisions; the bill sets no penalties and names no enforcer
  5. Cross-filed with SB 906; would have taken effect June 1, 2025

Latest legislative action

Mar 17, 2025. Referred Education, Energy, and the Environment

Sponsors

NameRoleDistrict
R Sponsor HD-004
D Sponsor HD-045
D Sponsor HD-044
D Sponsor HD-003

Roll call votes

H Third Reading: Passed Mar 17, 2025

128 yea11 nay2 otherPassed

Amendments (1)

  • Favorable with Amendments 903529/1 Adopted Adopted 2025-03-17

Related and companion bills

Topics and industries

Related topics

Affected industries

This page is general information, not legal advice. Summaries are AI-assisted and may contain errors; read the statute for the controlling text and talk to a lawyer about your situation. Full disclaimer · Report an error