Skip to content

Session Expired

Your session has expired. Please sign in again to continue where you left off.

Sign In Again

MN SF4927: Delivery of professional services preclusion through artificial intelligence directly to consumers

Dead/Failed Minnesota · 2025–2026 session

Last verified Oct 16, 2026 · official bill text

SF4927 · where it stands

This bill did not become law (dead/failed) · last action Apr 7, 2026.

What do these statuses mean?
Introduced
Filed in the legislature; may be waiting for a committee hearing.
Passed a chamber
Approved by one or both chambers; awaiting further action.
Enacted
Signed into law, or became law without a signature or over a veto.
Effective date
The date the law says it takes effect. Once it has passed, the page shows "Effective" and the date. A court order can still block a law; if we know of one, the summary says so.
Dead / vetoed
Vetoed, failed, or the session ended without action.

In one paragraph

Not law. Minnesota's SF 4927 would have added Minn. Stat. 325F.701, barring the owner of an AI model, or any business or person using one, from letting the model provide a professional service (one the state licenses, certifies or registers) to a consumer unless a credentialed person operates it during the service. A credentialed professional could still use AI as a tool. The attorney general would enforce it under section 8.31. Introduced March 26, 2026 and never left committee.

Plain-English summary, written with AI assistance. The official text controls.

What it means for business

None: the bill died, so it creates no obligations for AI model owners or businesses in Minnesota.

Key provisions

  1. Would have added Minn. Stat. 325F.701 (chapter 325F), 'Prohibition on Artificial Intelligence Performing Licensed Activities'
  2. Professional services: services for which the state requires a license, certificate or registration; consumer: a natural person or business that is not a credentialed professional for the professional services it is seeking
  3. An owner of an AI model could not allow it to provide a professional service to a consumer unless a credentialed natural person (or one representing a credentialed business) operates it while the service is provided
  4. A business or person could not use an AI model to provide a professional service to a consumer without the same credentialed operator
  5. Exception: a credentialed professional may use an AI model as a tool to assist in performing a professional service
  6. Enforcement by the attorney general under section 8.31; the text sets no specific penalty amounts
  7. Companion: HF 4979 (same measure; also never left committee). Introduced March 26, 2026 and referred to Commerce and Consumer Protection; Boldon added as author April 7, 2026; no stated effective date

Latest legislative action

Apr 7, 2026. Author added Boldon; no further action before the 2025-2026 Legislature adjourned

Sponsors

NameRoleDistrict
D Sponsor SD-056
D Sponsor SD-025

Related and companion bills

Topics and industries

This page is general information, not legal advice. Summaries are AI-assisted and may contain errors; read the statute for the controlling text and talk to a lawyer about your situation. Full disclaimer · Report an error