Get emailed when this bill changes status, is amended, or advances.
Disclaimer: This page provides general informational summaries only and does not constitute legal advice. AI-generated content may contain errors. Always consult a qualified attorney for guidance specific to your situation.
Read full disclaimer →
If you use AI in Minnesota, you must ensure compliance with the prohibitions outlined in this bill or face potential penalties.
State
Minnesota
Bill Number
SF4573
Status
Introduced
Risk Level
High
Category
Comprehensive
Last Action
Mar 18, 2026
Last Verified
May 22, 2026
Data Updated
May 22, 2026
What do these statuses mean?▼
Introduced— Filed in the legislature; not yet heard in committee
In Committee— Assigned to and being reviewed by a legislative committee
Passed— Approved by one or both chambers; awaiting further action
Signed / Enacted— Signed into law by the governor; may or may not be in effect yet
Dead / Vetoed— Vetoed, failed to pass, or session expired without action
Unknown— Status data not yet available or awaiting classification
Affected Industries
Artificial IntelligenceGeneralTechnology
What This Means
Minnesota's SF4573 is intended to address AI use, but the specific prohibitions and regulations remain unclear due to unreadable bill text. Businesses should stay informed as details emerge.
Key Provisions
The specific uses of artificial intelligence intended to be prohibited are unclear.
The regulatory framework for AI deployment cannot be confirmed.
The bill's content is currently unreadable.
Latest Legislative Action
Referred to Judiciary and Public Safety
Bill Sponsors
Name
Role
District
Erin Maye QuadeD
Sponsor
SD-056
Compliance Checklist
Evaluate AI applications for compliance with prohibitions Who: Businesses using AI in Minnesota Penalty: Potential penalties for non-compliance
Full Legal Analysis
The bill SF4573 is intended to address the use of artificial intelligence within Minnesota, but the specific applications it seeks to prohibit are unclear due to unreadable bill text. Without access to the actual content, it is not possible to confirm the establishment of a regulatory framework or the absence of specified penalties for non-compliance. As AI regulation evolves, Minnesota may be positioning itself to address the ethical implications of AI technologies, but comparisons to other states' legislation are speculative without concrete evidence from the bill.
We use cookies for analytics to understand how visitors use this site. We also use essential cookies for site functionality.
See our Privacy Policy for details.