Skip to content

Session Expired

Your session has expired. Please sign in again to continue where you left off.

Sign In Again

NY A08833: Establishes understanding artificial intelligence responsibility act requiring developers of covered models to be strictly liable for certain injuries.

In Committee New York · 2025–2026 session

Last verified Oct 29, 2026 · official bill text

A08833 · where it stands

1 of 5 steps complete
  1. Introduced In committee
  2. Passed first chamber
  3. Passed both chambers
  4. Enacted
  5. Effective
What do these statuses mean?
Introduced
Filed in the legislature; may be waiting for a committee hearing.
Passed a chamber
Approved by one or both chambers; awaiting further action.
Enacted
Signed into law, or became law without a signature or over a veto.
Effective date
The date the law says it takes effect. Once it has passed, the page shows "Effective" and the date. A court order can still block a law; if we know of one, the summary says so.
Dead / vetoed
Vetoed, failed, or the session ended without action.
View full title

Establishes understanding artificial intelligence responsibility act requiring developers of covered models to be strictly liable for certain injuries.

In one paragraph

New York's A 8833, the "Understanding Artificial Intelligence Act," would add General Business Law §§ 1510 to 1512. Developers of "covered models" (trained with over 10^26 operations at a cost over $100 million) would be strictly liable, regardless of care exercised, for injuries to non-users caused by model conduct that would be negligence, an intentional tort or a crime if done by an adult human, unless the user or a modifying intermediary intended or reasonably anticipated it. Defamation is excepted. Would take effect immediately. Referred to Science and Technology June 9, 2025 (and January 7, 2026); it has not passed either chamber.

Plain-English summary, written with AI assistance. The official text controls.

What it means for business

None yet: the bill is pending. If enacted, developers of very large AI models would face strict civil liability for qualifying injuries to non-users, subject to the stated defenses.

Key provisions

  1. "Covered model": an AI model trained using more than 10^26 integer or floating-point operations at a cost exceeding $100 million, as reasonably assessed by the developer
  2. Except for defamation claims, developers are strictly liable "regardless of the degree of care they exercised" for injuries to a non-user that meet the actual-harm element of negligence
  3. Liability requires that model conduct factually and proximately caused the injury and was neither intended nor reasonably anticipated by the user or by an intermediary that fine-tuned or modified the model
  4. For torts requiring a mental state, a rebuttable presumption applies that the AI system had it if a natural person in similar circumstances would have; it is no defense that AI systems cannot have mental states
  5. Affirmative defenses: the model met the standard of care applicable to humans performing the same function, or the injury resulted from a "capabilities failure" that would not be negligence, an intentional tort or a crime if done by a human
  6. No penalties or enforcement agency are specified
  7. Would take effect immediately; introduced June 9, 2025, referred to Science and Technology, with no further action

Latest legislative action

Jan 7, 2026. referred to science and technology

Sponsors

NameRoleDistrict
D Sponsor HD-073
D Sponsor HD-075

Topics and industries

Affected industries

This page is general information, not legal advice. Summaries are AI-assisted and may contain errors; read the statute for the controlling text and talk to a lawyer about your situation. Full disclaimer · Report an error