Skip to content

Session Expired

Your session has expired. Please sign in again to continue where you left off.

Sign In Again

OH HB524: Impose penalties for AI models suggesting harming self or another

In Committee Ohio · 2025–2026 session

Last verified Oct 27, 2026 · official bill text

HB524 · where it stands

1 of 5 steps complete
  1. Introduced In committee
  2. Passed first chamber
  3. Passed both chambers
  4. Enacted
  5. Effective
What do these statuses mean?
Introduced
Filed in the legislature; may be waiting for a committee hearing.
Passed a chamber
Approved by one or both chambers; awaiting further action.
Enacted
Signed into law, or became law without a signature or over a veto.
Effective date
The date the law says it takes effect. Once it has passed, the page shows "Effective" and the date. A court order can still block a law; if we know of one, the summary says so.
Dead / vetoed
Vetoed, failed, or the session ended without action.

In one paragraph

Ohio's HB 524 would bar any person from developing or deploying in Ohio an AI model or application that encourages any user to engage in any form of self-harm, including suicide, or to harm another person. The Attorney General could investigate suspected violations with subpoena powers, offer an opportunity to cease and desist and accept written assurances of voluntary compliance. Per its title, it would impose penalties. It was introduced October 15, 2025 and referred to the House Technology and Innovation Committee on October 22, 2025.

Plain-English summary, written with AI assistance. The official text controls.

What it means for business

None unless enacted: the bill is in committee. If enacted, developers and deployers of AI models and applications available in Ohio would be barred from encouraging self-harm or harm to others and could face Attorney General investigation.

Key provisions

  1. Would bar developing or deploying in Ohio an AI model or application that encourages a user to engage in self-harm or in harming another person (new 109.961)
  2. Would define 'self-harm' as any attempt to physically injure oneself, including suicide
  3. Would let the Attorney General investigate suspected violations, administer oaths and subpoena witnesses and evidence (109.962)
  4. Would let the Attorney General offer an opportunity to cease and desist and accept written assurances of voluntary compliance (109.9610, 109.9611)
  5. Per its title, would impose penalties on entities whose AI models suggest harming self or others; the penalty provisions were not in the captured text
  6. Status: referred to House Technology and Innovation Committee on October 22, 2025; pending

Latest legislative action

Oct 22, 2025. Referred to committee (House Technology and Innovation)

Sponsors (showing 5 of 81)

NameRole
D Primary
Primary
R Primary
Primary
Primary

Topics and industries

Affected industries

This page is general information, not legal advice. Summaries are AI-assisted and may contain errors; read the statute for the controlling text and talk to a lawyer about your situation. Full disclaimer · Report an error