Skip to content

Session Expired

Your session has expired. Please sign in again to continue where you left off.

Sign In Again

OK HB3675: Health insurance; review agents; artificial intelligence system; adverse determinations; effective date.

Dead/Failed Oklahoma · 2026 session

Last verified Oct 10, 2026 · official bill text

HB3675 · where it stands

This bill did not become law (dead/failed) · last action Feb 11, 2026.

What do these statuses mean?
Introduced
Filed in the legislature; may be waiting for a committee hearing.
Passed a chamber
Approved by one or both chambers; awaiting further action.
Enacted
Signed into law, or became law without a signature or over a veto.
Effective date
The date the law says it takes effect. Once it has passed, the page shows "Effective" and the date. A court order can still block a law; if we know of one, the summary says so.
Dead / vetoed
Vetoed, failed, or the session ended without action.

In one paragraph

Oklahoma's HB 3675 (2026), as introduced, would have required a qualified human professional to review any adverse determination made by an algorithm, AI system or automated decision system in utilization review before it is finalized, let the Insurance Commissioner audit use of such systems, and required adverse-determination notices to give reasons and appeal rights. It was referred to the Rules Committee February 11, 2026 and died when the session ended May 14, 2026.

Plain-English summary, written with AI assistance. The official text controls.

What it means for business

None: the bill died and never became law. It would have required utilization review agents to have a qualified human review AI- or algorithm-made adverse determinations and give detailed notices.

Key provisions

  1. Would require any adverse determination made by an algorithm, AI system or automated decision system to be reviewed by a qualified human professional before being finalized (Sec. 2(A))
  2. Would define a qualified human professional as an individual with the training, education and certification required to legally make medical decisions
  3. Would let the Insurance Commissioner audit and inspect, at any time, a utilization review agent's use of an automated decision system (Sec. 2(B))
  4. Would not prohibit using such systems for administrative support or fraud detection (Sec. 2(C))
  5. Would require notice of an adverse determination to include the principal reasons, the clinical basis, the source of the screening criteria and review procedures, and the complaint and appeal process including independent review (Sec. 3)
  6. Would have taken effect November 1, 2026 if enacted
  7. Withdrawn from the Insurance and Commerce committees and referred to Rules February 11, 2026; died when the session ended May 14, 2026

Latest legislative action

Feb 11, 2026. Referred to Rules; died when the Oklahoma Legislature's 2026 session ended May 14, 2026

Sponsors (showing 5 of 6)

NameRole
Primary
Primary
Primary
Primary
Primary

Topics and industries

Affected industries

This page is general information, not legal advice. Summaries are AI-assisted and may contain errors; read the statute for the controlling text and talk to a lawyer about your situation. Full disclaimer · Report an error