State AI law
Oklahoma
AI laws
We track 23 artificial-intelligence bills and regulations in Oklahoma. 6 have been signed or enacted.
Last updated Oct 12, 2026 · How we collect and check bills
Where Oklahoma’s bills stand
23 bills- Introduced
- 0
- In committee
- 0
- Passed a chamber
- 0
- Signed or enacted
- 6
- Dead or vetoed
- 17
Overview
How Oklahoma regulates AI
Oklahoma has 23 published AI-related bills in our register, 6 of them signed or enacted. Every bill below links to its own page with the status, dates and a plain-English summary.
Industries these bills touch
Oklahoma AI law guides
Deepfake Laws in Oklahoma
Oklahoma has enacted deepfake legislation. See how it compares with other states, including penalties, scope and enforcement.
Oklahoma AI bills
RSS feed for OklahomaSchools; creating the Oklahoma Responsible Technology in Schools Act; requiring development of guidance for use of artificial intelligence a…
Oklahoma's Responsible Technology in Schools Act sets rules for AI in public schools from July 1, 2026. Classroom AI must be educator-directed, with a person reviewing AI outputs before use; AI may not be the main basis for grading, discipline, placement or other high-stakes decisions; and tools must suit students' ages and follow student-privacy law such as FERPA. Districts must give parents a yearly written list of AI tools, vendors and student data shared, and let them opt students out of student-facing AI without penalty. Each district board must adopt an AI policy before the 2027-28 school year.
Artificial intelligence; definitions; requiring operators make certain disclosure; preventative measures for minor account holders; prohibit…
Not law. SB 1521 would have required operators of public conversational AI services to tell minor users they are talking to AI, through a constantly visible disclaimer or at the start and every 30 minutes, prevent statements suggesting a human for minor accounts, offer minors no engagement rewards, never present the AI as providing professional mental health care, and refer users expressing suicidal ideation to crisis services. The Attorney General could seek $1,000 per violation, capped at $500,000 per company. The Senate (43-0) and House (90-0) passed different versions, but the Senate never voted on the House amendments, so it died with the session.
Artificial intelligence education; creating the AI Education Innovation Act, the AI Education Innovation Revolving Fund and the AI Education…
Oklahoma's HB 1782 (2025-26), as engrossed, would have created the Oklahoma AI Education Innovation Act, a revolving fund for AI in education split among four agencies, and an AI Education Advisory Council. It passed the House 81-9 on March 11, 2026 and was placed on the Senate General Order on April 21, 2026, but the Senate did not pass it, and it died when the session ended May 14, 2026.
State development; Oklahoma Gas, Artificial Intelligence, and Space Research Hub; National Laboratory; Oklahoma Department of Commerce; effe…
Oklahoma's HB 3176 (2026), as engrossed, would have created the Oklahoma Gas, Artificial Intelligence, and Space Research Hub (GAS Hub), administered by the Department of Commerce, to recruit and host a U.S. National Laboratory, plus a National Laboratory Development Program. It passed the House 51-37 on March 10, 2026, was referred to Senate Appropriations on April 16, 2026, and died when the session ended May 14, 2026.
Technology; artificial intelligence; state agencies; prohibited uses; permitted uses; Office of Management and Enterprise Services; effectiv…
Oklahoma's HB 3545 (2026), as engrossed, would have set rules for state agency use of AI: banning cognitive behavioral manipulation, discriminatory classification, real-time remote biometric identification in public spaces (with warrant and emergency exceptions) and deceptive deepfakes, and requiring human review of high-risk AI decisions. It passed the House 96-0 on March 11, 2026 and was referred to a Senate committee April 1, 2026; it died when the session ended May 14, 2026.
Crimes and punishments; creating and disseminating a digitization or synthetic media; making certain acts unlawful; emergency.
Not law. The committee substitute for HB 3299 would have made it a misdemeanor in Oklahoma (up to 1 year and $1,000) to create and disseminate synthetic media of another person's name, image, voice or likeness without written consent and with intent to deceive and cause harm, and a felony (up to 5 years and $10,000) when it causes over $25,000 in financial harm or is used for extortion or blackmail. It would also have required disclosure of synthetic media in political ads and attestations from content creators. It cleared House committees in February 2026 but never received a House floor vote.
Health insurance; review agents; artificial intelligence system; adverse determinations; effective date.
Oklahoma's HB 3675 (2026), as introduced, would have required a qualified human professional to review any adverse determination made by an algorithm, AI system or automated decision system in utilization review before it is finalized, let the Insurance Commissioner audit use of such systems, and required adverse-determination notices to give reasons and appeal rights. It was referred to the Rules Committee February 11, 2026 and died when the session ended May 14, 2026.
Technology; Protecting Consumers and Jobs from Predatory Pricing Act; personalized algorithmic pricing; consumer data; food retailers; effec…
Oklahoma's HB 3959 (2026), as introduced, would have created the Protecting Consumers and Jobs from Predatory Pricing Act. Per its title, it would require disclosure of personalized algorithmic pricing by food retail establishments, bar electronic shelving labels for large food retailers and for personalized or surveillance pricing, and bar use of protected class data in pricing. It was referred to committee February 4, 2026 and died when the session ended May 14, 2026.
Artificial intelligence; requiring informed consent for use by licensed mental health professional or health care provider; authorizing and …
Oklahoma's SB 2037 (2026), as introduced, would have required a licensed mental health professional to inform a patient in writing and get consent before using AI for supplementary support in recorded or transcribed therapy sessions, allowed AI for administrative or supplementary support if the professional stays responsible, and barred professionals from letting AI make independent therapeutic decisions. It was referred to a Senate committee February 3, 2026 and died when the session ended May 14, 2026.
Hospital and Medical Services Utilization Review Act; requiring utilization review organization that uses AI to adhere to requirements; proh…
Oklahoma's SB 1967 (2026), as introduced, would have amended the Hospital and Medical Services Utilization Review Act to set conditions on AI tools used in utilization review by review organizations and insurers, including that the tool not supplant provider decision-making; per the official bill summary, the tool could not deny a claim based on medical necessity. It was referred to a Senate committee February 3, 2026 and died when the session ended May 14, 2026.
Technology; deployers; AI chatbots; minors; age verification systems; emergency situations; effective date.
Oklahoma's HB 4083 (2026), as introduced, would have required deployers of generative AI chatbots to keep human-like features and social AI companions away from minors (under 18) using reasonable age verification, with an exception for qualifying therapeutic chatbots. Per its title, it would also have required emergency-situation detection and Attorney General and private enforcement. It was referred to Rules February 3, 2026 and died when the session ended May 14, 2026.
Health Insurance; prohibiting issue of outcomes with AI; requiring decisions to be made by provider; requiring disclosures. Emergency.
Oklahoma's SB 2038 (2026), as introduced, would have barred a health insurance issuer from issuing an adverse consumer outcome (denial, reduction or termination of coverage or benefits) that results from an AI system, required a licensed professional to review and issue such final decisions, and required a disclosure notice. It was referred to a Senate committee February 3, 2026 and died when the session ended May 14, 2026.
Artificial intelligence; establishing certain rights; prohibiting certain actions by certain entities; requiring certain actions by certain …
Oklahoma's SB 2085 (2026), as introduced, would, per the official bill summary, have barred the state from accepting bids from or renewing contracts with AI technology providers that do not attest they are not foreign-owned or foreign-adversary controlled, required AI companies to de-identify user data before selling it, restricted commercial use of a person's generative-AI likeness without consent, and set parental-consent rules for companion chatbots and minors. It was referred to a Senate committee February 3, 2026 and died when the session ended May 14, 2026.
Crimes and punishments; sexual obscenity; making certain acts unlawful; effective date.
Oklahoma's HB 1364 (2025) adds AI-made sexual images to the crime of nonconsensual dissemination of private sexual images. An artificially generated sexual depiction is an image that appears to authentically show a person nude or in sexual conduct that did not happen, produced mainly by technical means such as artificial intelligence or photo editing software. Sharing one of another person without their effective consent, intending or recklessly disregarding that it will harass, threaten or cause physical, emotional, reputational or economic harm, is a misdemeanor; sharing three or more within six months is a felony punishable by up to ten years. Effective November 1, 2025.
Artificial intelligence; prohibiting distribution of certain media and requiring certain disclosures. Effective date.
Oklahoma's SB 894 (Senate floor version) would bar any person or entity, within 90 days of an election, from creating or originally distributing synthetic media it has actual knowledge is a deepfake of a candidate or political party on the ballot, unless the media carries the disclosure "This ___ (image, audio, or video) has been manipulated or generated by artificial intelligence." The State Election Board could impose fines of up to $10,000, $5,000 or $1,000. The Senate committee reported it do pass as amended; it was placed on General Order and died when the 2026 legislative session ended on May 14, 2026 without passing.
Artificial intelligence; AI devices in health care; qualified end-user; deployer; quality assurance program; State Department of Health; eff…
Oklahoma's HB 1915, as introduced, would require AI devices used in health care that are medical devices under federal law to be deployed under FDA rules and used only by a qualified end-user (a licensed physician able to perform the task without the device). Hospitals, practices and other deployers would have to run a quality assurance program, an AI governance group and a device inventory, with penalties set by the State Department of Health. Referred to the House Rules committee February 4, 2025; the bill died when the 2026 legislative session ended on May 14, 2026 without passing.
Artificial intelligence; Responsible Deployment of AI Systems Act; AI Council; AI Regulatory Sandbox Program; Artificial Intelligence Workfo…
Oklahoma's HB 1916 (2025-26), as introduced, would have created the Responsible Deployment of AI Systems Act, covering public agencies and private entities that deploy AI systems affecting people in Oklahoma. Deployers would classify AI systems by risk (unacceptable, high, limited, minimal), assess them, and subject high-risk systems to oversight, notices and audits. It was referred to the Rules Committee on February 4, 2025 and died when the 2026 session ended May 14, 2026.
Artificial intelligence; requiring certain disclosure for certain media. Effective date.
Oklahoma's SB 746 (2025), by Sen. Seifried, would have required political advertisements, electioneering communications and other candidate or election media from a candidate, candidate committee, PAC or party committee to carry the disclosure "Created in whole or in part with the use of generative artificial intelligence" when generative AI content appears to show a real person doing something that did not occur. A depicted candidate could have sued. The bill was referred to the Technology and Telecommunications Committee February 4, 2025 and died when the session ended in 2026 (adjourned May 14, 2026).
Crimes and punishments; Oklahoma Law on Obscenity and Child Pornography; scope of certain unlawful act; definitions; effective date.
Oklahoma's HB 3642 (2024) widens the child pornography definition used across the state's obscenity and child pornography laws to cover fabricated images. It now includes any visual depiction of a child that has been adapted, altered or modified so the child appears to be engaged in sexually explicit conduct, and any obscene visual depiction that appears to be a child in such conduct, whether it shows a real child, is a computer-generated image, or is an image altered to look like a child. The act also reaches viewing, accessing, sharing and streaming such material. Effective November 1, 2024.
Artificial intelligence; definitions; establishing the rights of Oklahomans when interacting with artificial intelligence; effective date.
Oklahoma's HB 3453 (2024), as engrossed, would define artificial intelligence and declare that Oklahomans have rights when dealing with it: to know when they interact with AI in consequential exchanges or consume realistic content generated entirely by AI without human review, to rely on watermarks and content credentials, to consent to AI recreations of their voice or likeness, and to be free from algorithmic discrimination. It passed the House 89-0 on March 14, 2024 and was referred to Senate Judiciary March 27, 2024; it died when the 2024 session ended without Senate passage.
Autonomous vehicles; allowing fully automated vehicles to operate on public roads. Effective date.
Oklahoma's SB 1541 (2022) lets fully autonomous vehicles drive on public roads without a human driver when the automated driving system is engaged and the vehicle can reach a minimal risk condition if the system fails, can obey traffic laws and meets federal safety certification. Before driverless operation, the operator must file a law enforcement interaction plan with the Department of Public Safety and prove at least $1 million of insurance or self-insurance. The vehicle must stay at the scene of a crash and the owner must report it. The automated driving system counts as the licensed driver. Effective November 1, 2022.
Personal delivery devices; authorizing certain use; limiting certain jurisdictional powers. Effective date.
Oklahoma's SB 706 (2021) authorizes delivery robots. Personal delivery devices are electrically powered cargo devices of up to 550 pounds equipped with automated driving technology for operation with remote support and supervision. Devices may use sidewalks, crosswalks and local roads if they carry an identifying number and operator contact information, obey traffic signals, do not exceed 10 mph on sidewalks, have a controlled-stop system and lights, and do not carry placarded hazardous materials. Operators need $100,000 of liability insurance. Local governments may ban them but not regulate their design. Effective November 1, 2021.
Motor vehicles; creating the Oklahoma Driving Automation System Uniformity Act. Conditional effective date.
Oklahoma's SB 365 (2019) creates the Oklahoma Driving Automation System Uniformity Act. Only the State of Oklahoma may enact a law or take other action to regulate the operation of motor vehicles equipped with driving automation systems, meaning hardware and software able to perform part or all of the driving task on a sustained basis (SAE levels 1 to 5). Counties and municipalities may not prohibit, restrict or regulate the operation of such vehicles because they have driving automation systems, and existing local laws or ordinances restricting their testing or operation are superseded.
Get an email when Oklahoma AI bills change
We’ll email you when AI bills in Oklahoma are introduced or change status (at most one alert email a day), plus our weekly digest.
We’ll send a confirmation link first; nothing else is sent until you confirm. Unsubscribe anytime. Need alerts for specific bills only? Per-bill alerts come with Pro.