Skip to content

Session Expired

Your session has expired. Please sign in again to continue where you left off.

Sign In Again

OK SB1967: Hospital and Medical Services Utilization Review Act; requiring utilization review organization that uses AI to adhere to requirements; prohibiting A…

Dead/Failed Oklahoma · 2026 session

Last verified Oct 10, 2026 · official bill text

SB1967 · where it stands

This bill did not become law (dead/failed) · last action Feb 3, 2026.

What do these statuses mean?
Introduced
Filed in the legislature; may be waiting for a committee hearing.
Passed a chamber
Approved by one or both chambers; awaiting further action.
Enacted
Signed into law, or became law without a signature or over a veto.
Effective date
The date the law says it takes effect. Once it has passed, the page shows "Effective" and the date. A court order can still block a law; if we know of one, the summary says so.
Dead / vetoed
Vetoed, failed, or the session ended without action.
View full title

Hospital and Medical Services Utilization Review Act; requiring utilization review organization that uses AI to adhere to requirements; prohibiting AI from making certain determinations. Effective date.

In one paragraph

Oklahoma's SB 1967 (2026), as introduced, would have amended the Hospital and Medical Services Utilization Review Act to set conditions on AI tools used in utilization review by review organizations and insurers, including that the tool not supplant provider decision-making; per the official bill summary, the tool could not deny a claim based on medical necessity. It was referred to a Senate committee February 3, 2026 and died when the session ended May 14, 2026.

Plain-English summary, written with AI assistance. The official text controls.

What it means for business

None: the bill died and never became law. It would have restricted insurers' and review organizations' use of AI in utilization review, with penalties (per the bill summary) of up to $500,000 for a health benefit plan.

Key provisions

  1. Would require a utilization review organization, disability insurer or specialized health insurer using an AI tool to ensure it bases determinations on the enrollee's medical history, individual clinical circumstances and other clinical information (Sec. 2(A))
  2. Would require that the tool not base determinations solely on a group dataset, not supplant health care provider decision-making, not discriminate in violation of law, and not use patient data beyond its stated purpose under HIPAA
  3. Per the bill summary, would prohibit the tool from denying a claim based on medical necessity and require documentation of its use
  4. Per the bill summary, would make the organization open to inspection for audit or compliance review by the Insurance Commissioner
  5. Per the bill summary, would set a maximum penalty of $500,000 for a health benefit plan and $100,000 for a clinical peer reviewer, with possible license suspension and an additional $10,000 fine per willful violation
  6. Referred to Senate Technology and Telecommunications February 3, 2026; died when the session ended May 14, 2026

Latest legislative action

Feb 3, 2026. Second Reading referred to Technology and Telecommunications; died when the Oklahoma Legislature's 2026 session ended May 14, 2026

Sponsors

NameRole
Primary
Primary
Primary

Topics and industries

Affected industries

This page is general information, not legal advice. Summaries are AI-assisted and may contain errors; read the statute for the controlling text and talk to a lawyer about your situation. Full disclaimer · Report an error