Skip to content

Session Expired

Your session has expired. Please sign in again to continue where you left off.

Sign In Again

OR HB4103: Relating to artificial intelligence.

Dead/Failed Oregon · 2026 session

Last verified Oct 10, 2026 · official bill text

HB4103 · where it stands

This bill did not become law (dead/failed) · last action Mar 6, 2026.

What do these statuses mean?
Introduced
Filed in the legislature; may be waiting for a committee hearing.
Passed a chamber
Approved by one or both chambers; awaiting further action.
Enacted
Signed into law, or became law without a signature or over a veto.
Effective date
The date the law says it takes effect. Once it has passed, the page shows "Effective" and the date. A court order can still block a law; if we know of one, the summary says so.
Dead / vetoed
Vetoed, failed, or the session ended without action.

In one paragraph

Not law. Oregon HB 4103 (2026) would have created the Senator Aaron Woods Commission on Artificial Intelligence within Enterprise Information Services to study state government's use of AI and report annually to the Legislative Assembly by September 1. It would also have required the Department of Administrative Services to employ an individual responsible for the state's privacy, data protection and AI strategy. It passed the Information Management and Technology committee with amendments (A-engrossed) February 20, 2026, went to Ways and Means and was in committee upon adjournment March 6, 2026.

Plain-English summary, written with AI assistance. The official text controls.

What it means for business

No duties for private businesses. It would have created a state commission and a state AI strategy position.

Key provisions

  1. Commission of 10 voting and 6 nonvoting members would review state AI use, high-risk uses, privacy, job effects, discrimination, transparency and AI-generated replicas (A-engrossed version)
  2. Annual report to the Legislative Assembly on or before September 1, which may recommend legislation, regulations or policies
  3. DAS would employ, on the State Chief Information Officer's appointment, an individual responsible for the state's strategic vision on privacy, data protection and AI, who advises the commission
  4. DAS could charge a state agency, officer, board or commission for AI services it requests
  5. Appropriation amount left blank; no sunset, effective date or emergency clause in the text
  6. Do pass with amendments, A-engrossed, February 20, 2026; referred to Ways and Means; in committee upon adjournment March 6, 2026; not enacted

Latest legislative action

Mar 6, 2026. In committee upon adjournment.

Sponsors (showing 5 of 49)

NameRole
Primary
Primary
Primary
D Primary
D Primary

Roll call votes

Heard and Reported Out with Amendments Feb 20, 2026

5 yea0 nay1 otherPassed

Topics and industries

Affected industries

This page is general information, not legal advice. Summaries are AI-assisted and may contain errors; read the statute for the controlling text and talk to a lawyer about your situation. Full disclaimer · Report an error