Skip to content

Session Expired

Your session has expired. Please sign in again to continue where you left off.

Sign In Again

PA HB1779: In preliminary provisions, providing for algorithmic pricing transparency and fairness; and imposing duties on the Office of Attorney General and Bur…

In Committee Pennsylvania

Last verified Oct 23, 2026 · official bill text

HB1779 · where it stands

1 of 5 steps complete
  1. Introduced In committee
  2. Passed first chamber
  3. Passed both chambers
  4. Enacted
  5. Effective
What do these statuses mean?
Introduced
Filed in the legislature; may be waiting for a committee hearing.
Passed a chamber
Approved by one or both chambers; awaiting further action.
Enacted
Signed into law, or became law without a signature or over a veto.
Effective date
The date the law says it takes effect. Once it has passed, the page shows "Effective" and the date. A court order can still block a law; if we know of one, the summary says so.
Dead / vetoed
Vetoed, failed, or the session ended without action.
View full title

In preliminary provisions, providing for algorithmic pricing transparency and fairness; and imposing duties on the Office of Attorney General and Bureau of Consumer Protection.

In one paragraph

Pennsylvania's HB 1779 would require a clear disclosure, 'THIS PRICE WAS SET BY AN ALGORITHM USING YOUR PERSONAL DATA.', on advertised personalized algorithmic prices, and bar using protected class data to set prices differently. The Attorney General could seek injunctions and courts could impose up to $1,000 per violation. Referred to the House Consumer Protection, Technology and Utilities Committee August 4, 2025; it has not passed.

Plain-English summary, written with AI assistance. The official text controls.

What it means for business

If enacted, retailers and others using personalized algorithmic pricing would have to add the disclosure and avoid protected-class pricing, risking injunctions and up to $1,000 per violation; insurers and financial firms are excluded.

Key provisions

  1. Anyone who knowingly advertises or publishes a personalized algorithmic price based on consumer data specific to an individual would have to include the disclosure 'THIS PRICE WAS SET BY AN ALGORITHM USING YOUR PERSONAL DATA.' (proposed 12 Pa.C.S. 103(a))
  2. No one could use protected class data in setting a price if it denies accommodations or advantages or yields a different price based in whole or in part on that data (103(b))
  3. Attorney General could investigate and seek an injunction in Commonwealth Court or common pleas court; a court could impose a civil penalty of up to $1,000 per violation (103(c))
  4. A person harmed by a protected-class pricing violation could complain to the Bureau of Consumer Protection, which must investigate (103(d))
  5. Does not apply to licensed insurers or to financial services such as financial institutions and their affiliates, broker-dealers, investment advisors and consumer credit providers (103(e))
  6. Would take effect 60 days after becoming law

Latest legislative action

Aug 4, 2025. Referred to Consumer Protection, Technology & Utilities

Sponsors (showing 5 of 62)

NameRole
Primary
D Primary
Primary
Primary
Primary

Topics and industries

Affected industries

This page is general information, not legal advice. Summaries are AI-assisted and may contain errors; read the statute for the controlling text and talk to a lawyer about your situation. Full disclaimer · Report an error