Skip to content

Session Expired

Your session has expired. Please sign in again to continue where you left off.

Sign In Again

TX SB668: Relating to the disclosure of information with regard to artificial intelligence.

Dead/Failed Texas · 2025–2026 session

Last verified Oct 10, 2026 · official bill text

SB668 · where it stands

This bill did not become law (dead/failed) · last action Apr 28, 2025.

What do these statuses mean?
Introduced
Filed in the legislature; may be waiting for a committee hearing.
Passed a chamber
Approved by one or both chambers; awaiting further action.
Enacted
Signed into law, or became law without a signature or over a veto.
Effective date
The date the law says it takes effect. Once it has passed, the page shows "Effective" and the date. A court order can still block a law; if we know of one, the summary says so.
Dead / vetoed
Vetoed, failed, or the session ended without action.

In one paragraph

Texas SB 668 (2025), as engrossed, would have added Business & Commerce Code Chapter 2003 requiring a person that uses AI to provide services to individuals in Texas and generated, or is more than 25 percent owned by a person who generated, at least $100 billion in total revenue to disclose on its website each AI model used, its purpose, and any third-party input and resulting model changes. A violation would have been a deceptive trade practice. It passed the Senate, but no enrolled version exists, so it died June 2, 2025.

Plain-English summary, written with AI assistance. The official text controls.

What it means for business

No duties for businesses because the bill died. Had it passed, only very large AI service providers (at least $100 billion revenue) would have faced the website disclosure duties.

Key provisions

  1. Sec. 2003.002: applies only to a person using AI to provide services to individuals in Texas with at least $100 billion in total revenue, or more than 25 percent owned by such a person
  2. Sec. 2003.003(a): 'shall disclose, on the person's Internet website' each AI model's name and functions and purposes
  3. Sec. 2003.003(a): disclose, to the best of the person's knowledge, each third party that provided input, a description of the input, and any model changes made based on it
  4. Sec. 2003.003(b): a user giving input in a personal capacity based on their own experience as a user is not a 'third party'
  5. Sec. 2003.004: no discipline or retaliation against an individual who in good faith reports a suspected violation
  6. Sec. 2003.005-.006: allow the attorney general to access records; a violation is a deceptive trade practice under Subchapter E, Chapter 17; no separate penalty amount
  7. Section 2: would have taken effect September 1, 2025; no enrolled version exists

Latest legislative action

Apr 28, 2025. Referred to Delivery of Government Efficiency

Sponsors

NameRoleDistrict
R Sponsor SD-001

Roll call votes

S Three day rule suspended Apr 24, 2025

31 yea0 nayPassed

S Read 3rd time Apr 24, 2025

31 yea0 nayPassed

Topics and industries

Related topics

AI TransparencyUser-Facing AI

Affected industries

Technology

This page is general information, not legal advice. Summaries are AI-assisted and may contain errors; read the statute for the controlling text and talk to a lawyer about your situation. Full disclaimer · Report an error

Related AI laws in Texas

All Texas bills →
HB149 Relating to regulation of the use of artificial intelligence systems in this sta HB18 Relating to the protection of minors from harmful, deceptive, or unfair trade pr SB1964 Relating to the regulation and use of artificial intelligence systems and the ma SB 1188 Relating to electronic health record requirements; authorizing a civil penalty. HB4635 Relating to disclosure of the use of artificial intelligence in the denial of in HB1709 Relating to the regulation and reporting on the use of artificial intelligence s

Same topic in other states

Maine LD1727 An Act to Ensure Transparency in Consumer Transactions Involving Artificial Inte Washington HB 2225 Concerning regulation of artificial intelligence companion chatbots. Connecticut SB00005 An Act Concerning Online Safety Iowa SF2417 A bill for an act establishing requirements and guidelines for conversational AI Utah SB226 Artificial Intelligence Consumer Protection Amendments Hawaii SB3001 Relating To Artificial Intelligence.