Get emailed when this bill changes status, is amended, or advances.
Disclaimer: This page provides general informational summaries only and does not constitute legal advice. AI-generated content may contain errors. Always consult a qualified attorney for guidance specific to your situation.
Read full disclaimer →
Virginia's HB1642 establishes critical guidelines for the use of artificial intelligence in the criminal justice system. It emphasizes that AI-generated recommendations cannot be the sole basis for key judicial decisions, ensuring that human judgment remains central. This bill affects judicial officers and other decision-makers in the criminal justice process.
Key Provisions
AI-based recommendations cannot be the sole basis for judicial decisions.
All decisions must involve a human decision-maker.
The use of AI tools is subject to legal challenges or objections.
Latest Legislative Action
Acts of Assembly Chapter text (CHAP0637)
Bill Sponsors
Name
Role
District
C.E. HayesD
Sponsor
HD-077
Karen Keys-GamarraD
Sponsor
HD-007
Nadarius ClarkD
Sponsor
HD-079
Rae CousinsD
Sponsor
HD-079
Rozia HensonD
Sponsor
HD-019
Roll Call Votes (showing 3 of 9)
H ·
House concurred in Governor's recommendation (96-Y 0-N) ·
Apr 2, 2025
96 Yea 0 Nay 4 OtherPassed ✓
S ·
Senate concurred in Governor's recommendation (40-Y 0-N) ·
Apr 2, 2025
40 Yea 0 NayPassed ✓
H ·
Senate substitute agreed to by House (96-Y 1-N) ·
Feb 18, 2025
96 Yea 1 Nay 3 OtherPassed ✓
S ·
Passed Senate with substitute (39-Y 0-N) ·
Feb 17, 2025
39 Yea 0 Nay 1 OtherPassed ✓
S ·
Constitutional reading dispensed (on 2nd reading) (36-Y 0-N) ·
Feb 14, 2025
36 Yea 0 Nay 4 OtherPassed ✓
S ·
Reported from Courts of Justice with substitute (15-Y 0-N) ·
Feb 12, 2025
15 Yea 0 NayPassed ✓
H ·
Read third time and passed House (97-Y 0-N) ·
Jan 23, 2025
97 Yea 0 Nay 3 OtherPassed ✓
H ·
Reported from Courts of Justice with substitute (22-Y 0-N) ·
Jan 17, 2025
22 Yea 0 NayPassed ✓
H ·
Subcommittee recommends reporting with substitute (8-Y 0-N) ·
Jan 15, 2025
8 Yea 0 Nay 1 OtherPassed ✓
Compliance Checklist
Ensure human oversight in all AI-related judicial decisions Who: Judicial officers and decision-makers in the criminal justice system Penalty: Legal challenges or objections to AI use
Full Legal Analysis
HB1642 introduces significant regulations regarding the use of artificial intelligence-based tools in Virginia's criminal justice system. Specifically, it prohibits the use of AI-generated recommendations or predictions as the sole basis for decisions related to pre-trial detention, prosecution, adjudication, sentencing, probation, parole, correctional supervision, or rehabilitation of offenders. All such decisions must involve a human decision-maker, ensuring that AI serves only as a supportive tool rather than a replacement for human judgment.
The bill applies to all judicial officers and individuals responsible for making decisions in the criminal justice context. It does not specify a compliance deadline, as it is effective immediately upon approval. Non-compliance could lead to legal challenges or objections against the use of AI recommendations in judicial proceedings.
Key definitions within the bill clarify what constitutes an 'artificial intelligence-based tool,' encompassing machine learning models, predictive analytics, and decision support systems. This broad definition ensures that various forms of AI applications are covered under the regulation.
In comparison to similar laws in other states, Virginia's approach aligns with growing concerns about algorithmic accountability and the need for human oversight in automated decision-making processes, particularly in sensitive areas like criminal justice.
We use cookies for analytics to understand how visitors use this site. We also use essential cookies for site functionality.
See our Privacy Policy for details.