Get emailed when this bill changes status, is amended, or advances.
Disclaimer: This page provides general informational summaries only and does not constitute legal advice. AI-generated content may contain errors. Always consult a qualified attorney for guidance specific to your situation.
Read full disclaimer →
The bill criminalizes the use of synthetic digital content for fraud, allowing civil actions for damages and establishing a work group for further study, with provisions requiring reenactment by 2026.
Virginia's HB2124 expands legal definitions and penalties related to synthetic digital content, particularly in fraud cases. It allows individuals depicted in such content to seek damages and mandates a work group to study enforcement, with provisions requiring reenactment by 2026. This legislation impacts creators and users of digital content, especially in the context of deepfakes.
Key Provisions
Defines 'synthetic digital content' as digital representations that falsely depict individuals.
Criminalizes the use of synthetic digital content for committing fraud as a Class 1 misdemeanor.
Allows individuals depicted in synthetic digital content to seek civil damages.
Establishes a work group to study enforcement of laws related to synthetic digital content, with meetings to be completed by November 1, 2025.
Prohibits limiting protections under 47 U.S.C. a7 230 for interactive computer services.
Requires recommendations to be reported by the first day of the 2026 Regular Session.
Provisions of the first enactment will not become effective unless reenacted by the 2026 Session of the General Assembly.
Latest Legislative Action
Acts of Assembly Chapter text (CHAP0398)
Bill Sponsors
Name
Role
District
Elizabeth Bennett-ParkerD
Sponsor
HD-045
Irene ShinD
Sponsor
HD-086
Jackie GlassD
Sponsor
HD-089
Michelle MaldonadoD
Sponsor
HD-050
Roll Call Votes (showing 3 of 7)
H ·
Senate Amendment agreed to by House (Y-88 N-7 A-0) ·
Feb 14, 2025
88 Yea 7 Nay 5 OtherPassed ✓
S ·
Passed Senate with amendment (39-Y 0-N) ·
Feb 12, 2025
39 Yea 0 Nay 1 OtherPassed ✓
S ·
Constitutional reading dispensed (on 2nd reading) (40-Y 0-N) ·
Feb 11, 2025
40 Yea 0 NayPassed ✓
S ·
Reported from Courts of Justice with amendment (15-Y 0-N) ·
Feb 10, 2025
15 Yea 0 NayPassed ✓
H ·
Read third time and passed House (87-Y 9-N) ·
Jan 31, 2025
87 Yea 9 Nay 4 OtherPassed ✓
H ·
Reported from Communications, Technology and Innovation (20-Y 2-N) ·
Jan 27, 2025
20 Yea 2 NayPassed ✓
H ·
Subcommittee recommends reporting (9-Y 1-N) ·
Jan 22, 2025
9 Yea 1 Nay 1 OtherPassed ✓
Amendments (2)
Courts of Justice AmendmentPending—
Senate AmendmentPending—
Compliance Checklist
Ensure synthetic digital content is not used for fraudulent purposes. Who: All individuals and entities creating or using synthetic digital content. Penalty: Class 1 misdemeanor for violations.
Prepare for potential civil actions from individuals depicted in synthetic content. Who: Creators and distributors of synthetic digital content. Penalty: Liability for actual damages and attorney fees.
HB2124 amends existing Virginia law to include synthetic digital content within the scope of defamation, slander, and libel, defining it as digital content that falsely depicts an individual's appearance, speech, or conduct. The bill makes it a Class 1 misdemeanor to use such content for committing fraud, establishing a separate offense from the primary crime. Individuals depicted in the synthetic content can pursue civil actions for damages, including attorney fees. The Attorney General is tasked with forming a work group to evaluate current laws and recommend further actions regarding synthetic digital content, particularly deepfakes. The work group must complete its meetings by November 1, 2025, and report its findings by the first day of the 2026 Regular Session. The provisions of the first enactment of the act will not become effective unless reenacted by the 2026 Session of the General Assembly. This bill aligns with growing concerns about the misuse of AI-generated content in fraudulent activities and reflects similar legislative trends in other states addressing deepfake technology.
We use cookies for analytics to understand how visitors use this site. We also use essential cookies for site functionality.
See our Privacy Policy for details.