Skip to content

Session Expired

Your session has expired. Please sign in again to continue where you left off.

Sign In Again

Free template

AI acceptable use policy template, with the state laws it has to account for.

An AI acceptable use policy tells your staff which AI tools they may use, what data they may put into them, when a person must check the output, and when customers, applicants or patients must be told AI is involved. No state law we track requires a general AI acceptable use policy, but a growing number of laws set rules your policy has to respect. This template is written to be adopted as is or edited, and under each section it lists the enacted duties that section has to account for, read from the official text.

Written by AI Laws by State 21 duties from 17 enacted laws in 10 jurisdictions Laws last checked November 14, 2026 How we verify Information, not legal advice
Download as Word with Pro

Who needs one

The template

Replace the highlighted [placeholders], delete anything that does not fit how you work, and circulate. Under each section, open the list to see the enacted laws that section has to account for.

AI Acceptable Use Policy[Company] · Version [1.0] · Effective [date]

1. Purpose and scope

Sets out who the policy covers and what counts as AI, so there is no argument later about whether a tool was in scope.

This policy sets the rules for using artificial intelligence (AI) tools at [Company]. It applies to all employees, contractors, interns and anyone else who works on [Company]'s behalf ("you"), on any device, whenever the work is for [Company].

"AI tool" means any software that generates text, code, images, audio or video, or that makes or recommends decisions, predictions or classifications, including chatbots, writing and coding assistants, transcription and meeting tools, and AI features built into other software.

[AI governance owner, e.g. Chief Technology Officer or Legal] owns this policy. Questions go to [contact email].

2. Approved tools

Most AI risk comes from tools nobody vetted. A short approved list, and a way to add to it, keeps use visible.

Use only AI tools on [Company]'s approved list at [link to list]. The list says, for each tool, which data may be used with it and for what purposes.

To request a new tool, submit [request form or process]. [AI governance owner] reviews the vendor's terms, data handling and security before approval. Do not sign up for an AI tool for work using a personal account.

Turn off settings that let a vendor train on [Company] data unless [AI governance owner] has approved it in writing.

3. Data you may and may not use

The fastest way to cause a breach is pasting confidential or personal data into a public chatbot. Some professions now have statutory rules on this.

Do not enter the following into any AI tool unless it is approved for that category of data: personal information about customers, applicants, patients or employees; health, financial or biometric data; passwords, keys or credentials; confidential business information; or information covered by a confidentiality agreement or legal privilege.

Public information and your own drafts that contain none of the above may be used with any approved tool.

If you are unsure whether data may be used, treat it as confidential and ask [AI governance owner] first.

2 enacted duties this section has to account for
Starts January 1, 2027 California generative AI law for attorneys and arbitrators (SB 574)
Attorney: Do not enter confidential, personal identifying or other nonpublic information into a generative AI system unless access to it is restricted to the attorney and authorized persons bound to confidentiality. Applies when: When using generative AI to assist in the practice of law. · Bus. & Prof. Code § 6068.1(a)(3)(A)
Starts January 1, 2028 Vermont consumer data privacy act (Act 145 of 2026, S.71): profiling and automated decision provisions
Controller: State in the privacy notice whether it collects, uses or sells personal data for the purpose of training large language models. Applies when: The controller provides the privacy notice required by the subchapter. · 9 V.S.A. § 2415e(c)(1)(H)

4. Human review and accountability

AI output can be confidently wrong. Laws in health care and insurance already require a qualified person to make the final decision.

You are responsible for anything you produce with AI as if you wrote it yourself. Check AI output for accuracy, completeness, bias and tone before you use or share it.

Do not let an AI tool make a final decision that affects a person's job, pay, credit, housing, insurance, health care, education or legal rights. A qualified person must review the relevant information and make that decision.

Verify facts, figures, quotations and citations against the original source. Do not cite a source you have not checked exists.

1 enacted duty this section has to account for
Starts October 1, 2026 Alabama law on AI in health plan prior authorization (SB 63)
Health benefit plan provider: Have a licensed physician or other health care professional competent to evaluate the AI's recommendation make every determination to deny, delay or modify a service. Applies when: A medical necessity determination that denies, delays or modifies a health care service where artificial intelligence is used. · SB 63 § 1(b)(3)

5. Telling people when AI is involved

Disclosure is the most common AI rule in force today. Several states require you to say so when a customer or patient is dealing with AI.

If a customer or member of the public communicates with an AI tool on [Company]'s behalf, such as a chatbot or voice agent, it must clearly identify itself as AI at the start, and whenever someone asks whether they are talking to a person.

When AI is used in providing a regulated professional service or health care, tell the client or patient in the way and at the time the applicable law requires. [AI governance owner] keeps the approved wording.

Do not tell anyone, directly or by implication, that AI-generated content was written or reviewed by a person if it was not.

7 enacted duties this section has to account for
Starts January 1, 2027 California customer service chatbot law (AB 1609)
Large private business: Clearly and conspicuously disclose, in the medium the chatbot uses, that it is artificially generated and not human. Applies when: When a reasonable person interacting with the chatbot is likely to be misled to believe they are interacting with a human. · Bus. & Prof. Code § 22626(b), (c)
Starts January 1, 2027 California generative AI law for attorneys and arbitrators (SB 574)
Attorney: Disclose the use of generative AI to the court for all documents submitted to the court. Applies when: When generative AI was used. The attorney must also consider disclosure when it is used to create content provided to the public. · Bus. & Prof. Code § 6068.1(a)(3)(C)
When triggered Rhode Island Use of Artificial Intelligence by Healthcare Providers Notification Act (H 7538)
Healthcare provider or healthcare facility: Notify patients of the use of AI for the sole purpose of documenting the visit. Applies when: The provider or facility uses AI to document an in-person or telehealth visit. The text does not say how or when the notice must be given and does not require consent. · new Title 23 chapter, section 3 (printed 23-106108-3 in P.L. 2026, ch. 372; 23-106-3 in H 7538 Substitute A)
When triggered Texas Responsible Artificial Intelligence Governance Act (TRAIGA)
Health care service provider: Disclose AI use to the patient or their representative no later than the date the service is first provided, or as soon as reasonably possible in an emergency. Applies when: An AI system is used in a health care service. · Bus. & Com. Code 552.051(f)
Starts September 1, 2025 Texas electronic health record requirements, including AI use by practitioners (SB 1188)
Health care practitioner: Disclose to patients the practitioner's use of AI for diagnostic purposes. Applies when: A practitioner uses AI for diagnostic purposes under section 183.005(a). · Health & Safety Code 183.005(b)
When triggered Utah Artificial Intelligence Policy Act
Supplier: If a person clearly and unambiguously asks whether they are dealing with AI, disclose that they are interacting with generative AI and not a human. Applies when: A supplier uses generative AI to interact with an individual in a consumer transaction and the individual asks or prompts about AI use. · Utah Code 13-75-103(1)
When triggered Utah Artificial Intelligence Policy Act
Individual providing services in a regulated occupation: Prominently disclose generative AI use in a high-risk AI interaction: verbally at the start of a verbal interaction and in writing before a written interaction begins. Applies when: Generative AI is used in a high-risk AI interaction while providing regulated-occupation services, on and after May 7, 2025. · Utah Code 13-75-103(2)(a), (3)

6. AI in hiring, promotion and discipline

Employment is the most regulated use of AI. Notice, consent and bias-audit duties apply before you use a tool on candidates or employees.

Do not use any AI tool to screen, rank, interview, evaluate, promote, discipline or terminate candidates or employees unless [HR leader] and [AI governance owner] have approved that use in writing.

Before an approved tool is used, [HR] gives any notice, obtains any consent and completes any bias audit that the law where the person lives or works requires, and keeps a record of it.

A person, not the tool, makes every final employment decision, and can explain the reasons for it.

6 enacted duties this section has to account for
When triggered California workplace automated decision systems law (SB 947)
Employer: Give the affected employee a written, plain-language, stand-alone post-use notice when informing them of the decision. Applies when: When the employer primarily relied on an ADS for a disciplinary or termination decision. The notice states the reliance, the human review, a human contact and the anti-retaliation rule. · Lab. Code § 1524
Starts January 1, 2020 Illinois Artificial Intelligence Video Interview Act
Employer: Notify each applicant, before the interview, that artificial intelligence may be used to analyze the video interview and consider the applicant's fitness for the position. Applies when: Before asking applicants to submit video interviews for a position based in Illinois that will be analyzed with AI. · 820 ILCS 42/5(1)
Starts January 1, 2020 Illinois Artificial Intelligence Video Interview Act
Employer: Obtain each applicant's consent, before the interview, to be evaluated by the AI program; do not use AI to evaluate applicants who have not consented. Applies when: Before asking applicants to submit video interviews for a position based in Illinois that will be analyzed with AI. · 820 ILCS 42/5(3) and closing sentence
Starts January 1, 2026 Illinois Human Rights Act AI-in-employment amendment (Public Act 103-0804)
Employer: Notify employees that the employer is using AI for the listed employment purposes; failing to notify is a civil rights violation. Applies when: When AI is used for recruitment, hiring, promotion, renewal, training selection, discharge, discipline, tenure or terms of employment, on and after January 1, 2026. Timing and means are left to Department rules. · 775 ILCS 5/2-102(L)(2)
Starts January 1, 2023 New York City automated employment decision tools law (Local Law 144 of 2021)
Employer or employment agency: Do not use an automated employment decision tool unless it has been the subject of a bias audit conducted no more than one year before the use. Applies when: The tool is used to screen a candidate or employee for an employment decision in the city. · Admin. Code § 20-871(a)(1)
When triggered New York City automated employment decision tools law (Local Law 144 of 2021)
Employer or employment agency: Notify each such candidate or employee, at least 10 business days before use, of the job qualifications and characteristics the tool will use in its assessment. Applies when: An automated employment decision tool will be used to assess or evaluate a city resident who applied for a position. · Admin. Code § 20-871(b)(2)

7. AI-generated images, audio, video and likeness

Altered media and digital replicas of real people carry disclosure duties and lawsuit risk.

Do not create or share AI-generated or AI-altered images, audio or video of a real person without that person's written permission, or impersonate a real person's voice or likeness.

Label AI-generated or materially altered media in advertising or public communications where the law or [Company]'s brand standards require it, and never use it in a way that would mislead a reasonable person.

Do not remove watermarks, provenance data or AI labels from content.

3 enacted duties this section has to account for
Starts January 1, 2025 California AI political advertisement disclosure law (AB 2355)
Political committee: Include, clearly and conspicuously, the disclosure: Ad generated or substantially altered using artificial intelligence. Applies when: Any qualified political advertisement the committee creates, originally publishes or originally distributes. Display or speak it in the manner set by §§ 84504 to 84504.5. · Gov. Code § 84514(a)
Starts January 1, 2025 Illinois Right of Publicity Act digital replica amendments (HB 4875)
Person: Do not knowingly distribute, transmit or make available to the general public a sound recording or audiovisual work that you actually know contains an unauthorized digital replica. Applies when: Acts on or after January 1, 2025; the Section 35(c) exemptions apply. · 765 ILCS 1075/30(b)
Starts January 1, 2027 Wisconsin real estate AI-altered advertising disclosure (AB 456)
Real estate licensee: Disclose in the advertising when it was altered with technology, including AI, to add, remove or change property elements in a misleading way. Applies when: All advertising by a licensee, when the alteration creates a false or misleading impression of the property. · Wis. Stat. § 452.136(1m)

8. Claims about AI and professional credentials

Several states bar AI from being presented as a licensed professional.

Do not describe an AI tool, or its output, as coming from or endorsed by a doctor, nurse, lawyer, therapist, dietitian or other licensed professional unless a licensed professional actually provided or reviewed it.

Marketing claims about what [Company]'s AI can do must be accurate and supported, and approved by [Marketing and Legal] before publication.

2 enacted duties this section has to account for
Starts January 1, 2026 California law against AI posing as a licensed health professional (AB 489)
Developer or deployer of an AI system: Do not use terms, letters or phrases that indicate or imply the AI's care, advice, reports or assessments come from a licensed human health care professional. Applies when: Advertising or functionality of an AI or generative AI system, program or device. · Bus. & Prof. Code § 4999.9(c)
Starts January 1, 2027 Colorado conversational AI service law (HB 26-1263)
Operator: Do not state in advertising, the interface or outputs that the service's output comes from, is endorsed by, or equals a licensed health, legal or mental health professional or dietitian. Applies when: Applies to all advertising, interfaces and outputs of the service. · C.R.S. 6-1-1708(5)

9. Prohibited uses

A short, explicit list removes doubt about the uses that are never acceptable.

Never use AI tools at work to: create sexual or intimate images of anyone; harass, threaten or deceive people; generate malware or bypass security controls; make decisions about people based on protected characteristics; or do anything that would be unlawful without AI.

Do not use AI to monitor, profile or infer the emotions, health or private characteristics of employees or customers unless [AI governance owner] and [Legal] have approved it in writing.

10. Intellectual property and confidentiality

Ownership of AI output, and the rights in what you feed it, are still unsettled.

Do not enter third-party copyrighted material, source code or trade secrets into an AI tool unless [Company] has the right to do so.

Before publishing or shipping AI-generated material as [Company]'s own, check it does not reproduce third-party content and that the tool's terms let [Company] use it commercially.

11. Reporting problems

Early reports of errors, leaks or harmful output are how an organization finds out a tool is going wrong.

Report to [AI governance owner / security contact] within [24 hours] if you: put data into an AI tool that this policy does not allow; see an AI tool produce harmful, biased or false output that reached a customer or employee; or learn of a complaint about [Company]'s use of AI.

Reports made in good faith will not lead to retaliation.

12. Training, review and enforcement

A policy nobody has read protects no one. Annual review keeps it in step with new laws.

Everyone covered by this policy completes AI training when they join and [annually]. Teams using AI for hiring, health care, customer communications or decisions about people complete additional training.

[AI governance owner] reviews this policy at least once a year and whenever a new law, tool or use case requires it. Last reviewed: [date].

Breaking this policy may lead to loss of access to AI tools and disciplinary action, up to and including termination, in line with [Company]'s other policies.

Get it as a Word file

Pro members download this template as an editable Word file with the law list under each section, ready for Word, Google Docs or Pages. Pro also includes the downloadable compliance plan and deadline calendar, per-bill alerts and saved searches.

Questions

Is an AI acceptable use policy required by law?

No state law we track requires a general AI acceptable use policy for employees. But many enacted laws set rules your staff must follow when they use AI: telling people they are dealing with AI, notice and bias audits for hiring tools, disclosures in health care, limits on presenting AI as a licensed professional, and rules on synthetic media. A written policy is how you make sure those rules are followed. Each one is listed on this page under the section it affects.

What should an AI acceptable use policy include?

Who and what it covers, which tools are approved, which data may and may not be used, human review of output, when to disclose AI use, rules for hiring and other decisions about people, synthetic media and likeness, claims about professional credentials, prohibited uses, intellectual property, how to report problems, and training and review. This template has a section for each.

Who should own the AI policy?

One named person or role, often the chief technology officer, chief privacy officer or general counsel, working with HR for employment uses. The template uses the placeholder [AI governance owner] wherever that person needs to act.

How often should it be updated?

At least once a year, and whenever you adopt a new kind of AI tool or a new law takes effect where you operate. The laws listed on this page update automatically as we map new ones.

Can I use this template as is?

Replace the bracketed placeholders and it is ready to circulate, but it is a starting point, not legal advice. Which laws apply depends on where you operate, your industry and how you use AI. Check the linked sections of law and have a lawyer review your final policy.

Related

Information, not legal advice. This template is a starting point written by AI Laws by State. It does not decide whether any law applies to your organization; that depends on facts such as where you operate, your size, your industry and how you use AI. The laws listed are summarized from their official texts, which are linked; laws change, and courts and regulators can read them differently. Have a qualified lawyer review your final document. Using this page does not create an attorney-client relationship. See our terms of service.