Aviation surveillance technology; fees; prohibition
House Bill 2210 addresses the use of aviation surveillance technology in Arizona, but specific provisions cannot be confirmed due to the unavailability of the full bill text.
Limiting the use of automatic registration plate readers, requiring a search warrant for data from an automatic registration plate reader or security camera, and providing a penalty.
AB576 limits the use of automatic registration plate readers and requires a search warrant for data access, creating statutes 86.107 and 968.376.
Facial Recognition Technology Warrant Act of 2025
The Facial Recognition Technology Warrant Act of 2025 requires law enforcement in Minnesota to obtain a warrant before using facial recognition technology.
Protecting Everyone from Excessive Police Surveillance (PEEPS) Act
The PEEPS Act regulates access to databases revealing historical locations of citizens or vehicles to protect privacy.
Provides for municipal and state police authorities to acquire and to utilize automated license plate readers and identify what data may be collected and in what ways the data can be used.
This bill permits municipal and state police to acquire and use automated license plate readers, detailing data collection and usage guidelines.
Facial Recognition Act of 2025
HB4695, the Facial Recognition Act of 2025, regulates law enforcement's use of facial recognition technology, including restrictions, enforcement mechanisms, and penalties.
Law Enforcement - Use of Facial Recognition Technology - Images Captured in Dwelling Interior
The bill allows law enforcement to use facial recognition technology for investigating specific crimes using images captured inside dwellings.
Video Surveillance
The bill regulates the use of AI in surveillance systems by state and local entities, focusing on data retention, judicial oversight, penalties, and annual reporting.
Prohibits use of facial recognition or biometric surveillance system on police body-worn cameras.
This bill prohibits the use of facial recognition or biometric surveillance systems on police body-worn cameras in New Jersey.
AI Regulation in the Surveillance Technology Industry
State legislatures across the United States are actively developing artificial intelligence regulations that directly affect Surveillance Technology companies and practitioners. These laws address a wide range of concerns including algorithmic discrimination, automated decision-making, data privacy, consumer transparency, and the use of high-risk AI systems that can materially affect individuals' lives. As of 2026, 9 states have introduced or enacted legislation with direct implications for Surveillance Technology.
Compliance requirements vary significantly by state, making it essential for Surveillance Technology legal and compliance teams to track both enacted laws and pending bills. Key obligations may include conducting algorithmic impact assessments, providing consumer disclosures when AI is used in consequential decisions, implementing risk management programs, and ensuring human-in-the-loop oversight for high-stakes outcomes. Penalties for non-compliance can be substantial — see our Penalty Tracker for details by state.
To assess your organization's specific compliance obligations under current and upcoming Surveillance Technology AI regulations, use our Am I Affected? tool. For upcoming enforcement dates, visit the Deadlines page or the Deadline Calendar. Use the Bill Comparator to analyze differences between state laws side-by-side.