Skip to content

Session Expired

Your session has expired. Please sign in again to continue where you left off.

Sign In Again

AL SB129: Artificial intelligence; disclosure of artificial intelligence-generated content required, enforcement provided

Dead/Failed Alabama · 2026 session

Last verified Oct 11, 2026 · official bill text

SB129 · where it stands

This bill did not become law (dead/failed) · last action Jan 13, 2026.

What do these statuses mean?
Introduced
Filed in the legislature; may be waiting for a committee hearing.
Passed a chamber
Approved by one or both chambers; awaiting further action.
Enacted
Signed into law, or became law without a signature or over a veto.
Effective date
The date the law says it takes effect. Once it has passed, the page shows "Effective" and the date. A court order can still block a law; if we know of one, the summary says so.
Dead / vetoed
Vetoed, failed, or the session ended without action.

In one paragraph

Alabama's SB 129 would require developers of generative AI systems that produce images, video or audiovisual content to include a clear, conspicuous and unavoidable disclosure that the content is AI-generated, plus metadata naming the tool and creation time, and to take reasonable steps to stop licensees and end users removing it. Violations would be unlawful trade practices with a private right of action. Referred to Senate Judiciary January 13, 2026; the bill died when the 2026 regular session ended without final passage.

Plain-English summary, written with AI assistance. The official text controls.

What it means for business

None: the bill did not pass and is not law. Had it passed, it would have required generative AI developers offering image and video tools in Alabama to add disclosures and metadata.

Key provisions

  1. Would require developers to ensure AI-generated images, video and audiovisual content carry a clear and conspicuous AI-generated notice, with metadata identifying the content as AI-generated, the tool used, and the date and time
  2. Would require the disclosure, to the extent technically feasible, to be permanent or not easily removed by later users
  3. Would require developers to impose contract terms and certifications forbidding end users and third-party licensees from removing disclosures, and to end access when they have reason to believe a disclosure was removed
  4. Would require third-party licensees to adopt similar procedures for their end users
  5. Would make a violation an unlawful trade practice under the Deceptive Trade Practices Act, with the Attorney General able to give 30 days' written notice to cure before suing
  6. Would let an injured person bring an action under Section 8-19-10, Code of Alabama 1975
  7. Not enacted: the proposed effective date was October 1, 2026, but the bill stayed in Senate Judiciary after first reading

Latest legislative action

Jan 13, 2026. Pending Senate Judiciary; died when the Alabama Legislature's 2026 regular session ended April 9, 2026

Sponsors (showing 5 of 10)

NameRole
Primary
D Primary
Primary
Primary
Primary

Topics and industries

Affected industries

This page is general information, not legal advice. Summaries are AI-assisted and may contain errors; read the statute for the controlling text and talk to a lawyer about your situation. Full disclaimer · Report an error