Skip to content

Session Expired

Your session has expired. Please sign in again to continue where you left off.

Sign In Again

CA AB1988: Companion chatbots: crisis interruption pauses.

Dead/Failed California · 2025–2026 session

Last verified Oct 8, 2026 · official bill text

AB1988 · where it stands

This bill did not become law (dead/failed) · last action Jun 26, 2026.

What do these statuses mean?
Introduced
Filed in the legislature; may be waiting for a committee hearing.
Passed a chamber
Approved by one or both chambers; awaiting further action.
Enacted
Signed into law, or became law without a signature or over a veto.
Effective date
The date the law says it takes effect. Once it has passed, the page shows "Effective" and the date. A court order can still block a law; if we know of one, the summary says so.
Dead / vetoed
Vetoed, failed, or the session ended without action.

In one paragraph

California's AB 1988, the Preventing AI User Self Endangerment (PAUSE) Act, would have required companion chatbot operators to adopt a public policy for credible crisis expressions (intent to harm self or others), warn the user on the first one, and on a second within 72 hours start a crisis interruption pause that continues until a human moderator reviews the chat. It passed the Assembly 73-0 on May 21, 2026; its three Senate committee hearings (June 12, 22 and 26) were canceled at the author's request, and the bill died. It did not become law.

Plain-English summary, written with AI assistance. The official text controls.

What it means for business

None: the bill did not pass. Had it become law, companion chatbot operators would have needed crisis monitoring, human review, record-keeping and annual reporting.

Key provisions

  1. Would have required an operator to monitor for credible crisis expressions and publish a policy for identifying and responding to them (B&P Code 22587.2)
  2. Would have required a warning on the first credible crisis expression, with 988 Suicide and Crisis Lifeline information
  3. Would have required a crisis interruption pause on a second expression within 72 hours, ending only after a human moderator reviews it and documents the course of action
  4. Would have required operators to document expressions and pauses and, from January 1, 2028, report annually to the Office of Suicide Prevention (22587.3)
  5. Would have been enforceable under Section 22605; passed the Assembly 73-0 on May 21, 2026, then stalled in Senate committee

Latest legislative action

Jun 26, 2026. In committee: Set, final hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.

Sponsors

NameRoleDistrict
D Sponsor HD-028

Roll call votes (showing 3 of 4)

A AB 1988 Pellerin Assembly Third Reading May 21, 2026

73 yea0 nay7 otherPassed

A Do pass May 14, 2026

15 yea0 nayPassed

A Do pass and be re-referred to the Committee on [Appropriations] with recommendation: To Consent Calendar Apr 21, 2026

16 yea0 nayPassed

Topics and industries

This page is general information, not legal advice. Summaries are AI-assisted and may contain errors; read the statute for the controlling text and talk to a lawyer about your situation. Full disclaimer · Report an error