Skip to content

Session Expired

Your session has expired. Please sign in again to continue where you left off.

Sign In Again

CA AB316: Artificial intelligence: defenses.

Effective Jan 1, 2026 California · 2025–2026 session

Last verified Oct 1, 2026 · official bill text

AB316 · where it stands

All steps complete
  1. Introduced Complete
  2. Passed first chamber Complete
  3. Passed both chambers Complete
  4. Enacted Complete
  5. Effective Since Jan 1, 2026
What do these statuses mean?
Introduced
Filed in the legislature; may be waiting for a committee hearing.
Passed a chamber
Approved by one or both chambers; awaiting further action.
Enacted
Signed into law, or became law without a signature or over a veto.
Effective date
The date the law says it takes effect. Once it has passed, the page shows "Effective" and the date. A court order can still block a law; if we know of one, the summary says so.
Dead / vetoed
Vetoed, failed, or the session ended without action.

In one paragraph

California's AB 316 adds Civil Code § 1714.46. In a lawsuit against a defendant who developed, modified or used artificial intelligence alleged to have harmed the plaintiff, the defendant may not argue that the AI autonomously caused the harm. Defendants may still raise any other affirmative defense, including evidence on causation or foreseeability, and evidence of the comparative fault of other people or entities. Signed October 13, 2025 (Chapter 672); effective January 1, 2026.

Plain-English summary, written with AI assistance. The official text controls.

What it means for business

Companies that develop, modify or use AI cannot escape liability in California lawsuits by arguing the AI acted autonomously; defenses on causation, foreseeability and others' comparative fault remain available.

Key provisions

  1. New Civil Code § 1714.46; artificial intelligence means an engineered or machine-based system that varies in its level of autonomy and can, for explicit or implicit objectives, infer from its input how to generate outputs that can influence physical or virtual environments
  2. In an action against a defendant who developed, modified or used AI that is alleged to have caused harm to the plaintiff, it is not a defense, and the defendant may not assert, that the AI autonomously caused the harm
  3. Defendants may still present any other affirmative defense, including evidence relevant to causation or foreseeability, and other evidence relevant to the comparative fault of any other person or entity
  4. Signed October 13, 2025 (Chapter 672, Statutes of 2025); effective January 1, 2026

Latest legislative action

Oct 13, 2025. Chaptered by Secretary of State - Chapter 672, Statutes of 2025.

Sponsors (showing 5 of 64)

NameRole
Coauthor
Author
Author
Coauthor
Principal Coauthor

Roll call votes (showing 3 of 8)

AB 316 Krell Concurrence in Senate Amendments Sep 9, 2025

78 yea0 nay2 otherPassed

3rd Reading AB316 Krell By Umberg Sep 8, 2025

38 yea0 nay2 otherPassed

Do pass Aug 29, 2025

7 yea0 nayPassed

Topics and industries

Related topics

Affected industries

This page is general information, not legal advice. Summaries are AI-assisted and may contain errors; read the statute for the controlling text and talk to a lawyer about your situation. Full disclaimer · Report an error