Skip to content

Session Expired

Your session has expired. Please sign in again to continue where you left off.

Sign In Again

CO HB1212: Public Safety Protections Artificial Intelligence

Dead/Failed Colorado · 2025 session

Last verified Oct 10, 2026 · official bill text

HB1212 · where it stands

This bill did not become law (dead/failed) · last action May 5, 2025.

What do these statuses mean?
Introduced
Filed in the legislature; may be waiting for a committee hearing.
Passed a chamber
Approved by one or both chambers; awaiting further action.
Enacted
Signed into law, or became law without a signature or over a veto.
Effective date
The date the law says it takes effect. Once it has passed, the page shows "Effective" and the date. A court order can still block a law; if we know of one, the summary says so.
Dead / vetoed
Vetoed, failed, or the session ended without action.

In one paragraph

Not law. Colorado's HB 25-1212, as introduced, would have protected workers at developers that trained a foundation AI model costing at least $100 million in compute. Developers could not prevent or retaliate against workers who disclose information they have reasonable cause to believe shows a legal violation, a substantial public safety or security risk, or false or misleading statements about such risks, and would have had to notify workers and offer an anonymous internal disclosure process. Workers could sue for reinstatement, the greater of $10,000 or lost pay, and attorney fees. House Judiciary amended it; it never passed the House and its status is Lost.

Plain-English summary, written with AI assistance. The official text controls.

What it means for business

None: the bill died, so it creates no obligations in Colorado.

Key provisions

  1. Covers developers that trained at least one foundation model with a compute cost of at least $100 million (C.R.S. 8-13.6-101)
  2. Developers may not prevent or retaliate against worker disclosures, made with reasonable cause, of legal violations, substantial public safety or security risks or misleading statements about them (8-13.6-102)
  3. Developers must notify workers of these rights and provide an anonymous internal disclosure process with monthly status updates (8-13.6-103, -104)
  4. Workers may sue in district court for reinstatement, the greater of $10,000 or lost pay, attorney fees, and punitive damages on clear and convincing proof of malice or reckless indifference (8-13.6-105)
  5. House Judiciary referred it as amended March 4, 2025; House second reading laid over to May 9, 2025; never passed the House

Latest legislative action

May 5, 2025. House Second Reading Laid Over to 05/09/2025 - No Amendments

Sponsors

NameRoleDistrict
D Sponsor SD-020
D Sponsor HD-032
R Sponsor HD-054

Roll call votes (showing 3 of 4)

H House Judiciary: Adopt amendment L.003 Mar 4, 2025

0 yea0 nay11 other

H House Judiciary: Adopt amendment L.002 Mar 4, 2025

5 yea4 nay2 otherPassed

H House Judiciary: Adopt amendment L.007 Mar 4, 2025

11 yea0 nayPassed

Amendments (2)

  • House Judiciary Amendment L.002 Adopted 2025-03-04
  • House Judiciary Amendment L.007 Adopted 2025-03-04

Topics and industries

Affected industries

This page is general information, not legal advice. Summaries are AI-assisted and may contain errors; read the statute for the controlling text and talk to a lawyer about your situation. Full disclaimer · Report an error