In one paragraph
Connecticut's SB 2, as passed by the Senate (File 603 as amended by Senate Amendments A and B, as described in the OLR bill analysis), would require anyone doing business in the state to tell consumers when they interact with an AI system, and deployers of high-risk AI systems used in consequential decisions to give notices, explain adverse decisions and allow correction and appeal, beginning October 1, 2026, with attorney general enforcement. It would also create AI studies, an AI Academy and a synthetic intimate image crime. Passed the Senate May 14, 2025; tabled on the House calendar May 16, 2025; it did not pass the House.
Plain-English summary, written with AI assistance. The official text controls.
What it means for business
None: the bill did not pass. It would have required businesses deploying consumer-facing or high-risk AI systems to make disclosures, and employers to report AI-related layoffs.
Key provisions
- Beginning October 1, 2026, anyone doing business in the state that deploys or makes available an AI system intended to interact with consumers would have to ensure each consumer is told they are interacting with AI, unless obvious to a reasonable person (secs. 1-2)
- Deployers of a high-risk AI system that makes or is a substantial factor in a consequential decision (education, employment, credit, government services, housing or legal services) would have to notify the consumer beforehand and disclose the system's purpose, the decision's nature and contact information
- For an adverse decision, the deployer would have to give the principal reasons and let the consumer correct incorrect personal data and appeal a decision based on it, with human review if technically feasible
- Violations would be Connecticut Unfair Trade Practices Act violations enforced solely by the attorney general, with no private right of action; HIPAA covered entities and federal contractors would be exempt
- Would create a new crime of unlawful dissemination of an intimate synthetically created image (sec. 22)
- Would require employers giving federal mass-layoff notice to tell the Labor Department whether layoffs relate to AI or technological change
- Would also create an AI Academy, a regulatory sandbox plan, a working group to report by February 1, 2026, state agency generative AI studies, a K-8 AI literacy initiative for alliance districts, and Connecticut Data Privacy Act changes
Latest legislative action
May 16, 2025. Favorable Report, Tabled for the Calendar, House; House Calendar Number 599
Sponsors (showing 5 of 47)
| Name | Role | District |
|---|---|---|
| Alphonse Paolillo D | Sponsor | HD-097 |
| Anthony Nolan D | Sponsor | HD-039 |
| Antonio Felipe D | Sponsor | HD-130 |
| Bobby Gibson D | Sponsor | HD-015 |
| Catherine Osten D | Sponsor | SD-019 |
Roll call votes (showing 3 of 4)
S Senate Roll Call Vote 173 May 14, 2025
32 yea4 nayPassed
J APP Vote Tally Sheet (Joint Favorable) May 12, 2025
37 yea11 nay5 otherPassed
J JUD Vote Tally Sheet (Joint Favorable) May 6, 2025
28 yea11 nay2 otherPassed
Amendments (7)
-
Senate LCO Amendment #8188 (D) Not adopted 2025-05-13
-
Senate LCO Amendment #8464 (D) Not adopted 2025-05-14
-
Senate LCO Amendment #8448 (R) Not adopted 2025-05-14
-
Senate LCO Amendment #8447 (R) Not adopted 2025-05-14
-
Senate LCO Amendment #8438 (R) Not adopted 2025-05-14
-
Senate Schedule A LCO# 8540 (J) Not adopted 2025-05-14
-
Senate Schedule B LCO# 8554 (D) Not adopted 2025-05-14
Topics and industries
Related topics
Affected industries
This page is general information, not legal advice. Summaries are AI-assisted and may contain errors; read the statute for the controlling text and talk to a lawyer about your situation. Full disclaimer · Report an error