Skip to content

Session Expired

Your session has expired. Please sign in again to continue where you left off.

Sign In Again

HI SB2908: Relating To Permitting.

Dead/Failed Hawaii · 2026 session

Last verified Oct 10, 2026 · official bill text

SB2908 · where it stands

This bill did not become law (dead/failed) · last action Mar 20, 2026.

What do these statuses mean?
Introduced
Filed in the legislature; may be waiting for a committee hearing.
Passed a chamber
Approved by one or both chambers; awaiting further action.
Enacted
Signed into law, or became law without a signature or over a veto.
Effective date
The date the law says it takes effect. Once it has passed, the page shows "Effective" and the date. A court order can still block a law; if we know of one, the summary says so.
Dead / vetoed
Vetoed, failed, or the session ended without action.

In one paragraph

Hawaii's Senate Bill 2908 (2026), as amended in HD 1, would have required the Department of Business, Economic Development, and Tourism to develop, with a selected county, an AI-assisted pre-compliance permitting intake pilot limited to single-family-home projects. The platform would have used AI for intake, routing and review, with human help preserved. It passed the Senate and House second reading, but was not enacted. It stated a July 1, 2050 effective date.

Plain-English summary, written with AI assistance. The official text controls.

What it means for business

None: the bill was not enacted. If enacted, it would have required DBEDT to build an AI-assisted permit intake pilot and would have put no duties on applicants.

Key provisions

  1. Would have required DBEDT to develop a permitting intake platform, as a pilot with a selected county, limited to projects involving single-family homes
  2. The platform would have used AI to support intake, routing and review, screened applications for completeness and inconsistencies, enforced required fields, validated parcel and zoning information and routed applications to all relevant county agencies at once
  3. Would have offered applicants guidance through an applicant-facing chat and FAQ resources, preserved in-person assistance and phone support, and required that automation or AI enhance rather than replace human service
  4. DBEDT would have had to develop a policy or metric to measure the pilot's success; the fiscal 2026-2027 appropriation was left blank and no funds would have been released unless the selected county provided matching funds
  5. Passed the Senate March 6, 2026; passed House second reading as amended March 20, 2026 and referred to WAL; no later action; stated effective date July 1, 2050

Latest legislative action

Mar 20, 2026. Passed Second Reading as amended in HD 1 and referred to the committee(s) on WAL with none voting aye with reservations; none voting no (0) and Representative(s) Quinlan excused (1).

Sponsors (showing 5 of 6)

NameRoleDistrict
D Sponsor SD-015
D Sponsor SD-024
D Sponsor SD-002
D Sponsor SD-012
D Sponsor SD-009

Roll call votes

S Senate Ways and Means: Passed, Unamended Mar 3, 2026

12 yea0 nay1 otherPassed

S Senate Economic Development and Technology: Passed, With Amendments Feb 12, 2026

4 yea0 nay1 otherPassed

S Senate Energy and Intergovernmental Affairs: Passed, With Amendments Feb 12, 2026

3 yea0 nay2 otherPassed

Related and companion bills

Topics and industries

This page is general information, not legal advice. Summaries are AI-assisted and may contain errors; read the statute for the controlling text and talk to a lawyer about your situation. Full disclaimer · Report an error