Skip to content

Session Expired

Your session has expired. Please sign in again to continue where you left off.

Sign In Again

HI HCR192: Requesting The Hawaii Civil Rights Commission To Examine The Applicability Of Existing State Anti-discrimination Laws To Algorithmic And Automated De…

Dead/Failed Hawaii · 2026 session

Last verified Oct 10, 2026 · official bill text

HCR192 · where it stands

This bill did not become law (dead/failed) · last action Apr 10, 2026.

What do these statuses mean?
Introduced
Filed in the legislature; may be waiting for a committee hearing.
Passed a chamber
Approved by one or both chambers; awaiting further action.
Enacted
Signed into law, or became law without a signature or over a veto.
Effective date
The date the law says it takes effect. Once it has passed, the page shows "Effective" and the date. A court order can still block a law; if we know of one, the summary says so.
Dead / vetoed
Vetoed, failed, or the session ended without action.
View full title

Requesting The Hawaii Civil Rights Commission To Examine The Applicability Of Existing State Anti-discrimination Laws To Algorithmic And Automated Decision Systems.

In one paragraph

Hawaii's House Concurrent Resolution 192 (2026) would have requested the Hawaii Civil Rights Commission to examine how existing state anti-discrimination laws apply to algorithmic and automated decision systems, and to report before the 2027 session. The House adopted it April 9, 2026, but in the Senate it was only received and referred to JDC on April 10, 2026; it was adopted by the House but not the other chamber and died. A concurrent resolution does not change the law.

Plain-English summary, written with AI assistance. The official text controls.

What it means for business

No duties for businesses. The resolution only asked a state agency to study algorithmic discrimination; it was adopted by the House alone and did not change the law.

Key provisions

  1. Requests the Commission to examine how existing anti-discrimination law applies to algorithmic and automated decision systems, noting their use in employment screening, tenant selection, credit decisions and public benefits
  2. Scope: whether existing law gives enough authority to investigate and remedy such discrimination; jurisdictional or evidentiary challenges; whether guidance or rulemaking would help; whether an intake or complaint pathway is feasible; and any recommended legislation
  3. Requests a report of findings and recommendations, including any proposed legislation, no later than twenty days before the 2027 Regular Session
  4. Non-binding: no duties or penalties; copies would go to the Commission's Chair and Executive Director
  5. Offered March 16, 2026; House ECD and JHA recommended passage; adopted by the House April 9, 2026; Senate referred it to JDC April 10, 2026 with no further action

Latest legislative action

Apr 10, 2026. Referred to JDC.

Sponsors (showing 5 of 36)

NameRole
Primary
Primary
Primary
Primary
Primary

Roll call votes (showing 3 of 4)

The committee(s) on EDT recommend(s) that the measure be PASSED, WITH AMENDMENTS. Apr 15, 2025

3 yea1 nay1 otherPassed

The committee(s) on HWN recommend(s) that the measure be PASSED, WITH AMENDMENTS. Apr 15, 2025

2 yea2 nay1 otherPassed

The committee on TOU recommend that the measure be PASSED, WITH AMENDMENTS. Apr 1, 2025

6 yea0 nay1 otherPassed

Related and companion bills

Topics and industries

This page is general information, not legal advice. Summaries are AI-assisted and may contain errors; read the statute for the controlling text and talk to a lawyer about your situation. Full disclaimer · Report an error