Skip to content

Session Expired

Your session has expired. Please sign in again to continue where you left off.

Sign In Again

IA SF2278: A bill for an act prohibiting personalized algorithmic pricing and surveillance pricing at certain food retail establishments, and providing civil pe…

Dead/Failed Iowa

Last verified Oct 8, 2026 · official bill text

SF2278 · where it stands

This bill did not become law (dead/failed) · last action Feb 12, 2026.

What do these statuses mean?
Introduced
Filed in the legislature; may be waiting for a committee hearing.
Passed a chamber
Approved by one or both chambers; awaiting further action.
Enacted
Signed into law, or became law without a signature or over a veto.
Effective date
The date the law says it takes effect. Once it has passed, the page shows "Effective" and the date. A court order can still block a law; if we know of one, the summary says so.
Dead / vetoed
Vetoed, failed, or the session ended without action.
View full title

A bill for an act prohibiting personalized algorithmic pricing and surveillance pricing at certain food retail establishments, and providing civil penalties.

In one paragraph

Iowa's SF 2278 (as introduced) would add Code chapter 554J for large food retail stores. Such a store using personalized algorithmic pricing based on a particular consumer's data would have to show "THIS PRICE WAS SET BY AN ALGORITHM USING YOUR PERSONAL DATA." Stores could not use electronic shelf labels, collect data of minors under 17 or use it for targeted ads or personalized pricing, or use protected class data in pricing. Civil penalty up to $7,500 per violation. Introduced February 11, 2026; it died in committee when the 2026 session ended.

Plain-English summary, written with AI assistance. The official text controls.

What it means for business

None: the bill died and did not become law. Large grocery-style retailers would have faced a pricing disclosure rule and limits on digital shelf labels had it passed.

Key provisions

  1. Food retail establishment: a store over 15,000 sq. ft. that primarily sells household foodstuff, or a store over 85,000 sq. ft. with at least 10 percent of sales floor area for nontaxable merchandise
  2. A food retail establishment that knowingly advertises or publishes an offer using personalized algorithmic pricing based on consumer data specific to a particular consumer would have to give a clear and conspicuous disclosure: "THIS PRICE WAS SET BY AN ALGORITHM USING YOUR PERSONAL DATA."
  3. Would bar electronic shelving labels or digital shelf displays (nondigital price presentation required), and bar using them to show personalized algorithmic or surveillance pricing; discounts and loyalty benefits based on purchase history remain allowed
  4. Would bar collecting data of minors under 17 or using it for targeted advertising or personalized algorithmic pricing, and bar using protected class data in pricing where it denies advantages or yields different prices
  5. Would not apply to financial services or to licensed insurers
  6. Attorney general enforcement with injunctions and civil penalties up to $7,500 per violation; aggrieved persons could also sue
  7. Status: introduced February 11, 2026, referred to Commerce, subcommittee assigned February 12, 2026; died in committee at the end of the 2026 session

Latest legislative action

Feb 12, 2026. Subcommittee: Driscoll, Bisignano, and Zumbach. S.J. 279.

Sponsors (showing 5 of 23)

NameRole
Primary
Primary
Primary
Primary
Primary

Topics and industries

Affected industries

This page is general information, not legal advice. Summaries are AI-assisted and may contain errors; read the statute for the controlling text and talk to a lawyer about your situation. Full disclaimer · Report an error