Skip to content

Session Expired

Your session has expired. Please sign in again to continue where you left off.

Sign In Again

IL HB5115: IDPH-DIAGNOSTIC ALGORITHM

Dead/Failed Illinois · 2023–2024 session

Last verified Oct 11, 2026 · official bill text

HB5115 · where it stands

This bill did not become law (dead/failed) · last action Jan 7, 2025.

What do these statuses mean?
Introduced
Filed in the legislature; may be waiting for a committee hearing.
Passed a chamber
Approved by one or both chambers; awaiting further action.
Enacted
Signed into law, or became law without a signature or over a veto.
Effective date
The date the law says it takes effect. Once it has passed, the page shows "Effective" and the date. A court order can still block a law; if we know of one, the summary says so.
Dead / vetoed
Vetoed, failed, or the session ended without action.

In one paragraph

Illinois's HB 5115 (103rd General Assembly) would have amended the University of Illinois Hospital Act, the Hospital Licensing Act and the Medical Patient Rights Act. Before using a diagnostic algorithm to diagnose a patient, a hospital would have to confirm it is certified by the Departments of Public Health and Innovation and Technology, is as or more accurate than other means, and is not the only diagnosis method available. It was not passed before the 103rd General Assembly ended (Session Sine Die, January 7, 2025).

Plain-English summary, written with AI assistance. The official text controls.

What it means for business

None: the bill died and never became law. It would have required hospitals to confirm certification, offer patients a non-algorithm option and get consent, and required proprietors to report on bias annually.

Key provisions

  1. A hospital would have to confirm, before using a diagnostic algorithm, that it is certified by the Department of Public Health and the Department of Innovation and Technology, has been shown to be as or more accurate than other diagnostic means, and is not the only method available
  2. For certification, the algorithm's proprietor would have to regularly evaluate it for bias and discrimination against groups protected under the Illinois Human Rights Act and report findings annually (110 ILCS 330/8j)
  3. The two Departments would have 3 months after the report to review it and could open third-party investigations; if bias is found and not addressed within 3 months, they would revoke certification until it is
  4. Under the Medical Patient Rights Act, a patient would have the right to be told a diagnostic algorithm will be used and to be offered diagnosis without it, and would have to consent to its use
  5. Introduced February 8, 2024 and referred to Rules Committee; no further action before Session Sine Die January 7, 2025

Latest legislative action

Jan 7, 2025. Session Sine Die

Sponsors (showing 5 of 15)

NameRole
D Primary
Primary
Primary
Primary
Primary

Topics and industries

Affected industries

This page is general information, not legal advice. Summaries are AI-assisted and may contain errors; read the statute for the controlling text and talk to a lawyer about your situation. Full disclaimer · Report an error